Absolutely. The US allows to to gain control via a democratic system. Flawed like all systems but still democratic. If you can gain power thru that system then you are the legitimate government.
North Korea is thru violence and forces that they maintain power. If you have the means to take control by their rules, then why is that less legitimate and unacceptable by many people? Is there a reason you think only Kim Jong Un alone should be able to use force to hold power?
I can get E. coli from chicken but that does not make me in anyway the expert in E. coli not should I be considered and expert or unbiased source in any way.
You are correct but I will put it a different way.
North Korea holds power over its people thru the use of force, violence and intimidation. And the world as well as most people think the current government is legitimate. By that logic, anyone or any authority that can take out that government thru the use of force or violence or intimidation would be just as legitimate.
In other words what makes Kim Jong Un more legitimate than if China were to install a puppet leader or if there US were to forcefully remove him and institute a democratic system as in South Korea?
Personally I think you are just as legitimate to attain and hold power providing you use the same rules as the current government used to attain and hold power.
North Korea and similar nations hold power thru the use of force and intimidation. What makes the government legitimate and recognized? Or better put, if another person or entity use force and intimidation to take control of that nation, what makes that less legitimate? After all they are following the rules of the previous government.
Doing this from Russia, taking a death that is, is much harder. For one he would have needed to take down his plane and those in it. Lots of people would have looked at it in that time. Then he would need to escape from Russia.
If he were to fake his death, this does not seem an easy way to do it.
The oil companies wanted to build a nuclear plant in my about 15 years back. Would have services about a million homes and industry. Public opinion shut it down.
They do care overall about over regulation. These kinds of regulations ensure startup are not able to enter those markets and take a few others out. Your large manufacturers will encourage these laws as it ensure less competition and they can easily navigate it. If your a small family operation and make a few hundred unique custom fans, there is no way you will afford the testing process to qualify. You think that is fine?
To be certain. I lean right for most policy. But not a single issue voter. Trump is a total shit show. Been banned from conservative groups because I will mention that. But both sides don't want the opposition to have good leadership. They do their best to take down any good leaders.
Nuclear only takes time and is expensive because it has been so hamstrung, building up that industry and expertise takes time. China is popping then it cookie cutter far cheaper. Start building then constantly not only will the price come down significantly, safety will increase.
I agree the EU should step up. As is free movement is part of the EU, external forces such as these refugees should also be spread among the EU nations or nations that houses then should receive some type of equalization fee.
That being said, what Italy is doing is outright illegal and against international treaties of which they are a part of. And if it's horrendous they would even consider this action.
I am rather with you on that. Barring him prior to any court proceedings sets a bad precedent. It would also rile up his supporters and they would have some legitimacy in their arguments.
That is quite possible mind you I would think the other people on the plane would make it known he was not on the plane. Before the crash that is.