zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼ @ Zeus @lemm.ee

Il faut imaginer Camus hébété.

---

Read more

Posts

4

Comments

201

Joined

2 yr. ago

oh fair enough, i forgot that some people hide the bookmarks bar because i find it really useful

You could put this in a button and inject it into the google page with a user script extension right?

yes, probably. but i wouldn't know how, i don't really use userscripts; i prefer to trigger things manually

if anyone else wants to do this: i release the above code under cc0, any person may use it for any purpose without let or hindrance, yada yada

That might get closer to what OP wants

i guess..? but i'm not sure of the functional difference between a button in the bookmarks bar, and a button on the page

this seems like something best solved with a bookmarklet

let me see if i can knock one up quickly

okay, i got a bit distracted, sorry it took so long

javascript:(function() {window.location="https://duckduckgo.com/?"+window.location.toString().match(/q=.*?(\&|$)/g);})()

just drag that into your bookmarks bar, then click it when you're on a google search page (please message me with any questions or bugs, i wrote this in five minutes with an online regex tester)

also, thank you for this post - i'd never thought of doing this, but it's a good idea

edit 2: okay, lemmy-ui currently has a bug with ampersands. please replace & in the script with just an "&"

little nightmares 1 & 2 are fantastic, i thoroughly recommend them to anyone; and this looks like it takes some influence from 9

greatly looking forward to this

this looks pretty cool actually, i hadn't heard of this

also; lemmysphere instance agnostic link: !retrodeck@lemmy.zip

well it'd obviously have to be digital, and it would be nice if it were secure as well

maybe down the line we could get a high capacity version, or even xtreme capacity

actually i'm also going to reply to you here just to check my message went through, as i'm not sure if lemmy -> kbin messages work

personally, i chose lemm.ee for, amongst other reasons, the federation policy. at the time i joined, l.e had blocked the fewest instances that i could find, i think it was only burggit.moe. i would choose to continue in this vein. i'm a big boy, and i can curate my own online experience - i'd rather do that than have someone do it for me

i have never had any problems with hexbear users (in fact, the few i've seen seem to be perfectly nice). it's possible that i've just missed it, but it's also possible that a lot of people are caught up in the hype of "the hexbears are nazis, let's all block them". i think if you browse subscribed: just don't subscribe to hexbear communities; and if you browse all: you have to be prepared to block some users/communities.

this is assuming this is possible: i think it would be considerably preferable for lemm.ee to block individual users and communities, rather than defederating a whole instance

i think if people want an instance that blocks instances they don't like, they should make they're own rather than pestering you about it (this isn't a "if you don't like it, go make you're own" - it's more "everyone has their own list of things they want to block, and i think people would find it easier to block exactly what they want on their own instance"). i personally would rather lemm.ee blocked every mastodon instance so i wouldn't get the twitter experience in my link aggregator, but i'm not going to request it because that would be selfish

at the time; the great suspender (although that's dead on chrome now too)

project naptha is the only one that has stuck with me since i left chrome, and has no firefox alternative to my knowledge

Left or right edge, it's the same. If you are holding your phone with your right hand, your thumb is either holding the phone by the right edge, or is just hovering on top of it.

OH. alright, i didn't know that, that's much better

At least on LineageOS it can register a diagonal swipe as long as it sorta fits into a 45° angle, either downwards or upwards.

yeah alright, that seems pretty reasonable then. i think that does sound fairly consistent and predictable

You don't need to reach the middle bottom of the screen, any area on the bottom can trigger the home/recents gesture.

okay actually that is good then. that's perfectly fine. (although when compared to buttons, i still don't know how i'm supposed to reach the left edge to go back)

The notification drawer has a bigger and more visible trigger area, tho.

yeah fair point, but it's still the same paradigm of an item that gets dragged into the screen

I thought you were talking about system gestures, not nav drawer

i was sort of talking about interaction inconsistencies, but alright let me rephrase: a swipe right goes back, but a diagonal swipe does [presumably] nothing despite them being pretty semantically similar

get well soon!

I made it implicit, but forgot to say out loud: While system gestures makes the open-drawer-edge-gesture worse to the point of unusable, I think that looking back it wasn't that good to begin with. Which is why I think Material Design never officially supported it in the first place, way before gesture navigation was a thing.

i mean, i'd say it's better than nothing. otherwise one has to reach all the way up to the top to press the hamburger menu

The pill-thingy is anchored to the bottom of the screen, so basically it always point to the ground, the back gesture is on the side. It isn't uncomfortable because it matches the easiest point to reach, which is the side of the screen relative to the user, not the device. This very old image shows the most reachable areas of a screen:

that doesn't seem hugely ergonomic - i can hardly reach the bottom middle of my phone, let alone the left edge

Either that, or you were reaching into the realm beyond the screen to bring it on. That is something that I never quite liked for app gestures, because not only is it implied that things exist outside the screen(which is fine), but that you can somehow reach for them.

well yeah, it's this exactly. your finger starts from off-screen, where the drawer is currently hanging out, and drag it on-screen. almost exactly the same as the notification drawer, the control centre on ios, or that stupid "charms" thingy on win8

Erm, there is no diagonal swipes, at least officially from Google. You just swipe perpendicular to the edge of the screen. So from the bottom edge you swipe up, from the left edge you swipe right, right edge to the left

i thought that was how one opened nav drawers with gestures enabled? a diagonal swipe; or swipe, wait, then swipe a bit more (which i'm not even going to go into how awful that is). including in official google apps?

ah, i see. in that case i can't say i agree. i'd say that it's fairly predictable - i can't think of a single app with a drawer in which it didn't work, until they introduced gesture navigation and broke it.

with a back button, it's always in the same corner; with a back gesture what happens when the phone is rotated? (i genuinely don't know) does it stay on the side it was on, or does it move so it's now on the left? wouldn't that make it very hard to reach with one hand?

A swipe from the edge to open a side sheet has a trigger area that extends far beyond the confines of the Hamburger Icon.

yes, but it doesn't extend beyond the confines of the drawer. in my head it's more like the drawer is always there, and you can trigger it with the hamburger, or "drag" it into view manually

And if any of the other gestures are present, then the edge gesture conflicts with them.

not really - one is from the edge, one is not. it doesn't conflict any more than scrolling up conflicts with the new home gesture (and is far less often accidentally triggered)

Even worse is, the gesture with no visible area is “on top” of the others that have a predictable area, despite the fact that they exist on the “same plane”.

that is reasonable. i can't say anything to refute that

Like, with the edge gesture to open a drawer, you need to keep the app elements in mind as if there is some physical elevation inside the app. The edge gesture is on top of the tab gesture, and things like that

i mean yeah, that's the very point of material design. the whole spec goes on and on about the information conveyed by implied depth

but even before that, drawers and menus usually had some type of drop shadow to imply depth (practical skeuomorphism at work^!)

With the system gesture, the elevation itself is between the app and the system. Almost like if the system gestures are a glass panel on top of the app. It is a predictable rule.

yeah, i subjectively don't like that. with nav buttons and a status bar, that's where the system was and that's how you interact with it. now it's an invisible layer over the whole screen that's not predictable at all; as a swipe right goes back, but a diagonal swipe does something else. that's two gestures on the same metaphorical "layer", one a system action and one an app action. weird.

Alright, but wasn’t the tab gesture also available on the holo era?

honestly i couldn't say with absolute certainty, but i don't think so?

The benefit is less conflicting gesture triggers occupying the same area. A swipeable card/list-item has the entire card/list-card as the visible trigger. A Tab has the entire content as the trigger area. The Navigation Drawer gesture is an invisible area that can be placed on top of the visible triggers of other components.

i'm not entirely sure that i'm following this correctly, but assuming i am: it's the same number of gesture triggers

• old design
  • swipe from edge: nav drawer
  • swipe from anywhere: switch tabs (or whatever)
  • tap back btn: navigate back
• your design
  • swipe from edge: navigate back
  • swipe from anywhere: nav drawer
  • missing input: switch tabs (or whatever)

The issue is that the hamburger button is not the only button that can appear in that that place, a back button is common on that same area.

that's a fair criticism

The trigger area isn’t the width of a button, but the width of a very specific button, and worse, it extends far beyond the edges of the button and shares the same height as the screen.

this i'm also not sure what you're saying? it seems like a good thing to me - it takes up no space, and can be accessed from any height

I do see your point that “anywhere” isn’t an improvement, but I have to disagree, as that is fundamentally the same gesture to swap tabs, and you can predict the area trigger as being “just any old fucking where”.

i wasn't strictly saying that, i was more refuting what i thought your point was: that "it's not a discoverable gesture unless it's tutorialised, because most people won't randomly swipe in from the edge"; which i think in most instances is a very fair point, but in this specific instance i think it is discoverable because the drawer pulls in from the side. (source: i discovered it without a tutorial, or reading the md docs)

Yesn’t. Material Design 1 and 2 guidelines have a bunch of sections regarding interaction, way more than M3 (although M3 guidelines aren’t “finished” yet), but they lack a section regarding that gesture in particular.

Like, M1 guidelines mention swiping on content to swap tabs, heck, you can even find the same on the current Material Design 3 guidelines

fair enough. although in that specific example you could construe that as a warning of unforeseen conflicts, rather than a recommendation to implement swipe gestures. like, it doesn't say "use swipe gestures for navigating between tabs", it just mentions it as though it's something the dev should already know (in the m1 guidelines, not m3 i guess)

I think it was a conscious design decision from the Material Design team to not use that gesture in particular? Because it isn’t due to conflict with other components, in the tab guidelines they call attention to be careful when the content itself is swipeable.

possibly? although i still maintain it's likely that they saw it as part of holo, so there was no need to respecify it for md^? the same that they don't specify that you can scroll down to move the content field^? especially as all of google's own apps supported that gesture

I mean, you already can’t have certain gestures with other gestures. Like you can’t (or shouldn’t) have swipe on a card to upvote at the same time you have swipe content to change tabs.

yes; but my point is that it reduces the available actions for no discernible benefit. it's not like they've added some spare buttons in the old place, like maybe bringing back the old universal menu button.

I’d argue this restriction is better for the user because with discord’s implementation it is very clear what the trigger area is, because the entire view is the trigger area.

maybe? i'm not sure about that though, as the hamburger button is on that side, and the drawer appears there; and i'd say "the edge from whence the drawer appears" is a lot clearer than "just any old fucking where", but maybe that's me

It’s funny, but I tried looking around the old Material Design guidelines and I haven’t come across any mention of swiping to open a drawer. I know it was on Android Developers, but it appears that from the point of view of the design team, it wasn’t really “officially” recommended?

i found this: https://web.archive.org/web/20140110123608/developer.android.com/design/patterns/navigation-drawer.html (alternative link in case archive.org is down) - i presume they removed it from the old spec when they introduced the gesture navigation, so people don't use it because it interferes with the gestures?

wait never mind i misread this paragraph. i presume it wasn't in the design spec as a) it's an interaction behaviour, not a visual design behaviour, and b) it was also a thing in holo design (& older[?]), so they didn't consider it part of the "material design spec"?

Regardless, Discord, IMO, offers a better implementation for side sheets, as the metaphor isn’t that you drag something from beyond the screen into view, you just drag the view itself to the side and that reveals the side sheet. And it works in the middle of the screen so it doesn’t interfere with the system gestures

it's not a bad idea if you're working around gestures, but it means you can't have something where you swipe between tabs when not from the edge, and get the drawer when from the edge

or, for example, swiping to reply/forward in a messaging app, or upvote/downvote on a lemmy client

(also, subjectively, it's kind of a bit ugly)

i've no mobility issues, but i can't stand that back gesture. it interferes with the ability to open drawers; and i can't spam it quickly to get out of a "deep" page in an app

gestures do have pros (for instance, the ability to hold and scroll through recents) but the back gesture just seems straight up worse to me