You want us to just give money to someone who was arrested and convicted?
\
\
\
\
\
Edit:
I guess the /s didn’t come across in my wording. It’s actually a relief to see all those downvotes.
I’m just so baffled that this could be “a hard sell” for anyone.
Payment should come right from the pensions of the department whose officer committed the arrest. No passing this off onto the taxpayers.
It’s narcissism all the way down. His sole motivation for anything is ego stroking. He lacks self esteem and the ability to value himself. His self worth only exists in validation from others.
That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did, you deserved it.
Only possibly in the short term, but not necessary.
In the long-run it protects profits since if everything goes to total shit, businesses eventually won’t have markets or customers.
It does make it a little harder to just do whatever the fuck you want, and man-babies running companies don’t like realizing they’re only human.
Two more points: If they’re so smart, they should be able to figure out success within the limits of physics (and its consequences for long-term capitalism). Everybody has to play by these rules, so it’s completely fair to have rather strict EPA regulations. Just like we should have strong financial regulations. The red tape is for the benefit of everyone—including the companies.
You want us to just give money to someone who was arrested and convicted?
\
\
\
\
\ Edit:
I guess the
/sdidn’t come across in my wording. It’s actually a relief to see all those downvotes.I’m just so baffled that this could be “a hard sell” for anyone.
Payment should come right from the pensions of the department whose officer committed the arrest. No passing this off onto the taxpayers.