Skip Navigation

User banner
The Yungest Onion
Posts
0
Comments
336
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Yeah, exactly. If it was the same size as a S7, I might consider it actually small.

  • This is really quite striking. Love the contrast.

  • Yeah, this right here is why shrooms scare the crap out of me. I'm intrigued by the positive benefits people claim they have, but the potential to leave deep mental scars if the trip goes 'wrong' is a risk I'm unwilling to take.

  • Those pictures are the best, thank you!

  • What a ridiculous situation. My local council is making service cuts left and right to make things meet. This level of austerity is unsustainable.

  • A largeth shipe appeared in the skie and fireth didst rain down from it and lo! didst the town below collapseth ento great ruin. And the townsfolk didst run and didst scream, but it didst them no good because the shipe didst striketh them down with furious anger.

  • Ah, no, we're not. We're on 'flexible', so that makes sense. Thanks.

  • How? We're also with Octopus and our prices have never been negative.

  • No, I'm looking at the images and thinking that it's not sunk. Which is what the Houthis are saying it was. Which is what the article is proving false. Which, again, is news not 'copium'.

  • OK, sure. But why should I, someone on a 100% renewable tariff, continue to pay energy prices that are dictated by a energy source I'm not using? That makes no sense to me.

  • The better wording might be 'British registered ship attacked by Houthi fighters, damaged and may sink' or something. It's very deliberately proving that the Houthi propaganda around its sinking is incorrect. That's not copium, it's news.

  • If you're on a renewables tariff your prices would go down. It would encourage people to switch. Otherwise you're prices would be no different to current.

  • A bigger question is why energy prices are still linked to gas prices, and not decoupled for renewables.

  • No, because this time they super pinky promise they won't need to crunch. Trust me, bro. This time they won't. They promise, bro.

  • Yes, because it's not smart enough to know what a '15th century African king' is, let alone what one should look like. I'm not saying that's a good thing, but I think people expect too much from these programs. If I wanted a maui chief, I'd start be specifying 'an African man in 15th century tribal gear' and take it from there. They mostly seem to work better if you specify the race you want, not just assume it understands enough about the historical period to do that for you.

  • Not sure why you're getting downvoted. The user essentially asked for the AI to generate some random made up rulers of England. Might as well have asked it for new Game of Thrones characters for all the difference it would have made. These are not real people so it, quite correctly, threw in a whole load of mixed races because why wouldn't it? No idea why people are getting bent out of shape over someone doing a poor job of assigning prompts.