Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)WR
Posts
14
Comments
319
Joined
12 mo. ago

    • the effort to provide historical accuracy, this is a time and area of Europe I only briefly learned about in middle school, so it felt nice having a glimpse of what life was like in 15th century Bavaria, are there games that try to portray life and folklore of people I may not know about? For context I am an average western European.

    I know of Never Alone, which is about a traditional fairy tale from the Alaskan native Iñupiaq tribe.

    It was a fun little game which introduced me to their folklore.

    Regarding the mystery detective work, Lucifer within us is a name you didn't mention yet. While it's not as strong a detective game as those you mentioned, it might help scratch the itch for a bit.

    Regarding the meta narrative, without too many spoilers I will just mention names: Undertale , Oneshot , Slay The Princess

    Especially the last one could be up your alley, since you like games witha lot of text.

  • No idea about that specific illness, but in general: yes it would be covered in the German system.

    In general if a doctor decided you need a certain, scientifically and widely accepted treatment for a certain illness to not die or bring you back to health, it will be covered by your insurance. But it will be the cheapest version, so no extras.

    And now comes the but: the insurances don't really like to pay that much over a longer time, so often chronically ill persons have to jump through loops to get the help and financing they need.

    For example chronically ill people need to prove via doctors note again and again that, yes, they are indeed still chronically ill and did not get healed by a miracle in the last year. It's argued that they do this to combat fraud, but honestly, I would much rather pay a bit more in my invoices and know that those who need it are not put under unnecessary stress.

  • To play gods advocate, good isn't an emotion. Good is a state of being, that could be defined and then other things can be judged by that definition to be good or not.

    Subjective? Sure. But no emotion needed for subjectivity.

    And to answer your rhetorical question: yes, they define it by god likes it equals it being good. Which is just the ultimate dictatorship, but Christians probably wouldn't even disagree with that notion, since that is exactly what is written in the Bible.

  • In high school I agree that learning it by heart is unnecessary. Studying chemistry in university though, I agree that the students there should know, at least roughly, where each element is. After all, a lot of reactivity and behavior depends on their period and which group they are in.