Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)WI
Posts
0
Comments
514
Joined
4 mo. ago

  • You have to use the variables given. He ate 4/6 of his pizza and the other guy ate 5/6. Saying he ate the other guys pizza would result in a tie (not more) and is not an option. The answer they wanted was "impossible", the kid gave the only real shenanigan proof viable answer.

  • Vil's version already looked like it was a Muppet movie.

    Scene: "The multicolored ship lands on its squishy feet, the mouthpiece front opens and a giant tonge-like gangplank slide extends out. The emperor's gurads slide down the tongue, followed by the Emperor himself."

    Vil's directors notes: "This thing is in space, they no use stairs now"

  • You make no sense.

    My point: The US is not ready fir a woman president and won't elect one. Dems need to stop running women.

    Your Point (apparently): Science says voters don't care if the candidate is male or female.

    Let's test your theory in the laboratory of life. To be correct by your measure the US should have around a 50% male/female ratio, we will say 40/60 proves it as well.

    There have been 45 people elected to the 60 US presidential terms.

    Let's look at the elected presidents. By your measure, should it not matter to voters, we should have had 20-23 women as president. We should also have 40-50% women in Congress, the House, and Senate. Let's check those numbers ....

    of US presidents in history: None

    Women in politics is currently the highest it has ever been. The numbers are 28% in Congress, 29% in the House and 25% in the Senate.

    Hmmm ... it looks like there is a substantial difference in how voters feel.

    This is the part where you throw a fit and start name calling.

  • You can't have "scientific proof" on an opinion. That's dumb. If voters don't care if the candidate is a man or woman THEN WHY HAVE THEY ALL BEEN MEN? I think that ends your "science" right there.

    This was the weirdest response I have ever had on Lemmy ... congrats.

  • It's not just Kamala Harris, it is democrats in general. I get that they want the first woman president ... but its not going to happen in this political environment. Many Hatian immigrants that voted for Trump just because they don't think a woman can be president. Copy that ... Trump said these people are eating cats and they still voted for him. Hispanics? News flash, they are predominantly Catholic ... so Pro Choice doesn't go over well for them. Then people got angry because Kamala skipped the whole nomination prosses. Stuff like this is why she lost. Biden should have ran, then resigned after he beat Trump again.

  • Input: CatGPT write me a 5000 word article on the Great Depression with captioned images.

    CatGPT writes "The food bowl is empty" a thousand times and includes three pictures of a mostly full food bowl with a dime sized section of the bottom of the bowl visible and the caption "Starvation"