WaxedWookie @ WaxedWookie @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

1,078

Joined

2 yr. ago

It was the false flag WHO cultural Marxist deep state WEF globalist elite Antifa BLM trans MSM Hollywood!

This is the point - he isn't.

...of course, that was never going to stop him - the principle underpinning all of this is that the rules only matter to Trump and the GOP as far as they can be used to harm their enemies and protect themselves.

It all is stupid.

I naturally assumed zitheads or shitheads, given the standard pronunciation of 'x' in words...

There's also the problems of supreme court bias and that the Dems would see locking him up as the greatest sin of all - being uncivil and disturbing the status quo.

My cheap dashcam does rolling saves if days worth of HD video... but aviation safety can only manage 2 hours of audio? Weeks worth of buffer should be trivial to add from both an economic and operational standpoint, and would have solved this issue (though not the door, obviously).

The logs should be getting pushed to a meaningful amount of local storage, and radio chatter saved centrally (there's almost certainly amateurs stockpiling these recordings - large institutions are definitely capable).

Yeah - that was a hard watch...

Air bud.

I had a golden retriever growing up, and he was the best friend I could have asked for. Seeing the dog in peril (I don't really remember the movie now) was too much, and I lost it.

Because while it may result in a stable, positive, loving relationship (or just mutually great, harmless sex that's what they're after), it's a strong predictor when people are actively seeking a relationship with that kind of gap. Think about the likely reasons someone would seek that kind of thing, and the likely outcomes. I think it's reasonable to look at this sort of thing with suspicion, but not to immediately dust off the pitchforks and light the torches.

Not all middle-aged single men distributing candy from the back of their windows van are paedophiles, but it's both reasonable and responsible to look at what they're doing with suspicion.

It's interesting you'd bring politics into this when conservatives seem so wrapped up in protecting child brides, child beauty pageants, fetishise youth, and appear to be massively over-represented represented in paedophilia stats.

Why?

I think they can be useful thought exercises to tease out people's priorities and values.

As though having the rules applied to them won't reenforce their victim complex.

If they lose - even thanks to a GOP judge (a wild concept) it'll be because of the elites... You know - the Jews.

They're somehow both moronic and evil.

Is that some of that librul virtue signalling I hear so much about?

Storming the capitol will get you shot with overwhelming force... just not if you're a far-right extremist - that kind of treatment is historically reserved for the leftists and minorities fighting for equal treatment.

Yikes - that really highlights the US's priorities...

If you're a felon, you can't represent yourself, but if you're a felon with money, you can represent everyone.

No taxation without representation, and no slavery... but felons aren't real people.

Private companies profit from confining people as cheaply as possible and exploiting their slave labour - all above board.

The land of the free has nearly a quarter of the world's prison population... but only ~4% of the world's people.

Doesn't being a convicted felon disqualify you from running in any case - or is that just voting?

I agree - people were under-charged.

It's showing what it says on the label - outcomes of cases relating to Jan 6. People are overwhelmingly guilty. Where's the reference to insurrection?

Yeah - I think that's mostly a product of media bias, and the right having unity in their messaging while the left is infighting about purity testing nonsense while the libs quiver, too afraid to do anything remotely productive for fear of disrupting the status quo.

They are both bad - it's just that there's a massive difference in how bad they are, and you don't get a third option.

I'm pretty sure it's already been ruled that he participated in an insurrection (the basis of the Colorado disqualification), but he hasn't been sentenced for it.

Then why do you need to construct strawmen?