Unquote0270 @ Unquote0270 @programming.dev

Posts

1

Comments

89

Joined

2 yr. ago

It's baffling that anyone reads their articles, let alone posts them as a basis for debate on a scientific topic.

Not a movie but The Handmaid's Tale.

Definitely lichess. It makes it very obvious how much of desperate cash cow chesscom is.

sudo pacdiff.

If you leave the pacnew files there you will always get this message. Use pacdiff to review the differences and what to do about the files.

They just banned pretty much all nsfw subs because of a "bug", including abuse support subs. Probably due to that.

And there was the white people twitter ban, as well as some Musk critical subs a day or two before the"bug".

Seems a lot of people share this view that somehow he's for the little guy, despite quite clearly being for the opposite. It's the same over the pond, there's a paranoia held by many that the government is out to persecute the common people. Very strange on both sides, it's almost Orwell levels of Newspeak.

You're too funny

What does atomic mean in this sense? That seems more confusing than immutable.

I don't need to prove you wrong with examples, you are wrong, it's very well documented and widely understood. If you choose to not believe it and can't be bothered to research it yourself then you have chosen to stay ignorant, and wrong, which is your right.

Name a counter example

Statistics isn't defined by examples. Educate yourself, this is a very well known and understood concept. Staying in ignorance is your choice.

Maybe do some research about statistical concepts before spouting what sounds good to you. Causation can absolutely 'come' without correlation.

You are a great example of someone not understanding that things are complex so you reach for tabloid explanations because they are comfortable and simple.

Dehumanising people makes it easy to hate and persecute them, and to blame them for a bunch of stuff which isn't their fault. It really is a classic move with a rich history.

Overlooked doesn't mean what you think it means.

Is the three musketeers really on par with the count? I've been meaning to read it for months but I always got the sense it would be disappointing.

All of HP Lovecraft's stories.

I liked it until about half way through, it seemed to lose all the intrigue and then there was the weird bit about rape (if I remember correctly) at which point I gave up. Shame because it started well.

Just finished Embassytown by China Mieville. Haven't read anything for ages so took the opportunity to get back into it on a lazy holiday. Highly recommend this book, or any by China, if you enjoy dense sci-fi.

Wtf that's crazy

Your assessment of probability is speculation and I didn't suggest you meant "always".

$DADDY