I mean, Boeing barely does, we have also shot countless things everywhere in the solar system... Heck, even Starship reached a stable orbit in like the 3rd test flight or so (practically, and throttled shortly before, so the thing returns). It's hard, but far from impossible with a competent team and strict management
I'm very curious how RDNA 4 will stack up against Battlemage. Ingl, if Intel had released a B580 x2, so like a 5120 shader class card, I would've probably bought it (or its sister SKU) already. Gonna be tough competition
'The lesser evil' might as well be left (leaning) from the majorities POV. In that case the shift would be to the left. And furthermore you seem to be assuming that this shift continues because you keep voting for the 'lesser evil'?
I think that's contradictory. Voting for someone is telling them you like their course best. Why would they change their course if they are already getting the votes? (Or lead the polls?) They would only do so to capture another parties audience - and only if their own ideas are not popular (enough) already. So the contrary is true: Parties tend towards whoever is getting more votes. This is only logical, because that's ultimately what they need.
Having to vote for a 'lesser evil' just means your system is broken, corrupt, or you feel like you have no other option. In functioning democratic systems, you will see fluctuations based on the general sentiment towards current topics. What's currently going on tends to have a much more significant impact on voters than any ideals.
To give you a very simplistic example: Economy bad -> People vote for guy who (they think) will fix it. This was a big factor in Trumps victory. (And there are probably also more racist then you think.)
Russia? I think you underestimate the gaslighting ability of our political parties, specifically the 'cinservative' ones. Talking about 'A'fD is a waste of breath, but christ-democrats are at 30%. Their idea of campaigning is comming up with bs just vaguely phrased enough to not be straight up lies.
For example, they claim around 100 billion in tax reliefs / benefits total if you elect them. Their idea of financing it? Cut welfare and hope the economy grows. Fun fact: The welfare they want to cut us about 50 billion in total and they can barely cut it, because they are required by law to provide some. They talk about 'double digit [billions of] savings', as if it was halfway across, when it's more like 1/10th of what they need (if they can even get it).
And this is just one example of them trying everything to get votes from people. Specifically who feel betrayed or forgotten by politics. The thing is they themselves betray them, don't care and just blame others for it.
The former acted because he was personally affected by a person supporting exploitation within a liberal system, the latter leads an authoritarian regime that allowed their CEOs to do what they do until they got annoying for whatever reasons.
So if you want to talk objective results here, sure, one of them got a higher kill count. However, who has the moral high ground here is not even up to debate IMO
Funnily enough I had more bugs on Tumbleweed than on Arch. Admittedly, most of them were probably not on Tumbleweed, but it seems like there are just much more people caring about Arch. Otherwise I can't explain why it gets so much better support
I'm not sure what to make of this, but I assume you wanted to say KDE does what it's supposed if you select the Wayland session. This would lead to my follow-up question: Why not just use it?
Wayland has been the preferred session for KDE since late 5.X
I use discover for Flatpaks and yay for everything else. Works mostly, although for some reason Discover fails sometimes (very rarely) where flatpak update doesn't
I don't know if it is available yet, but KDE Linux sounds pretty cool. It's kinda the same "Arch for everyone" take on Arch that Valve has going on with SteamOS, but with some pretty fancy stuff planned.
If you want to learn about a couple of cool customisations, you could also take a look at Garuda Linux, specifically the Dragonized Gaming Edition (aka Bloaty McBloatface Edition) or XeroLinux (although I don't know if that's maintained atm, I think the dev had to flew from a war in the middle east)
Is it legally wrong? Yes. Should it be legally persecuted? Absolutely. Is it, in this specific instance, morally justifiable or even admirable? I would say you could definitely argue that.
I'm not familiar enough with the dead guy to judge, but from what I have heard I'm leaning towards "yes and yes".
fish is a nice shell