Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TW
Posts
0
Comments
41
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • This is absolutely true. The women who actually prefer 7+ inches are rare, and most explicitly seeking it haven't actually experienced it. My girl prefers 5 or smaller because we can't do the things she enjoys at my size.

  • The size you're describing isn't small enough to even make jokes about. Believe me, I've heard women joke about size and it's the 2 inches or less while erect range; and even then it's about bad hookups or guys that have been awful to them.
    Girls that see random flaccid dick regularly are even less likely to joke about size.

  • The size you describe isn't small enough to merit being called small. It's barely below the statistical mean.

    What's more is that waxers are well aware that growers exist, and (at least in my area) that's mostly what they see. It wouldn't even be cause for comment. The kinds of things they even bother telling each other about are like people who want fancy patterns waxed, or who have awful smelling active infections and have to be told to go get treated and come back. Occasionally they might talk about big tough guys who end up weeping like a baby (not just tears in the eyes, but bawling), or when they personally make mistakes.

    At most your aesthetician told her that you got waxed and how she found out there was a connection. If your coworker bothered asking about your size she'd have gotten the usual response of, "who knows? You can never really tell during waxing because pain and fear of pain shrink things."

    Source: was married to an aesthetician for 10 years.

  • I'm exactly like you're describing and a little older than you (44). Songs, TV shows, movies, animated series. It's a trivial feat to make me tear up at pretty much anything someone might consider touching.

    I suppose it's outside of the statistical norm for our demographic, but I wouldn't say there's anything wrong with it. We feel things and we express those feelings when we have them. I'd argue it's a lot healthier than what the statistical mean of our cohort does.

  • It's MS Teams with their PowerAutomate flows from Fabric. The limitation might not exist in the direct rest API, which I could have used through Python; but it's a hackathon, and my other team mates know PowerAutomate. Faster if we each coordinate using what we're good with.

  • Honestly no idea. It's funny though. The API allows us to either read it directly from our lakehouse with the 28Kb limit, or allows us to encode it in a json object. It actually recommends using the json method if we want to send larger files... but then complains it's too large if it's over 28Kb 🤷‍♂️

    I think it was probably originally only intended to allow attaching icons.

  • Literally just today solved a problem of delivering analytics plots over our internal chat system. The file size limit is 28Kb and I was just getting ready to say screw it, can't be done.

    Lo and behold our chat system that doesn't support svg does support webp. Even visually complicated charts come in just below the size limit with webp.

  • I love seeing comments like yours where people change some of their thinking as a result of online discussion.

    I was starting to feel like no one listens to understand and only listen to respond, and comments like this help lift me out of that perspective.

  • I looked into it a little using TinEye and the image predates generative AI images of this quality. I actually think it's a photoshopped normal cat; possibly as part of that weird trend of making some small detail of a normal photo look freakish.

  • I'm gonna be brutally honest here: unless it's possible to reverse climate change impacts, the US was always going to invade and annex Canada. Even if we had a string of only progressive Presidents leading up to that point. The southern half of our country is about to become agriculturally useless and nearly uninhabitable. The only place for the US to go is north.

  • A thought for why it may have been easier for you to regularly use your paper journal while not maintaining the digital journal: it may be a matter of visual cuing.

    With the paper journal it sits somewhere that you'll see it regularly, probably along your route to bed. Seeing the journal may have been your mental cue to write in it, as opposed to simple routine or habit. You don't get the same kind of cue from a digital journal because even a set reminder is no different from the bevy of notifications your phone gives you throughout the day.

    Something that could help you keep up with your digital journal is to start keeping a physical journal in the same place you kept your old one. Maybe put an NFC tag in it that just launches your digital journal when scanned/tapped. Then you'll still have that visual cue and habit reaction force to keep you journaling.