Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TO
Posts
0
Comments
244
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Not just a product that consumers don't want to buy, but one that most consumers can't buy because of high prices and low wages.

    I purchased my current car used. I plan to purchase my next car used. The new car I bought in 2016 will likely be the last brand new car I ever buy (I know buying used typically makes more sense anyways, but the point still stands).

  • Autonomous vehicles are at times both amazingly advanced and bedshittingly idiotic.

    I've ridden ~25k miles in them for work, and I trust them more than 95% of the drivers on the road. But I've also experienced them acting in ways that are still quite far from the way humans would.

  • Right. I've dabbled in DBs and work with (relatively small) datasets in Sheets/Excel all the time, and agree that it would be trivial.

    But I wouldn't think that that data is available to the general public at this time, so where is this coming from? I could see if the letters were written as "hey, the public numbers look a little weird, someone with access should take a deeper look," but instead they were written as authoritative statements.

  • Still, there's surely lots of other races where one candidate is clearly awful, yet bullet ballot rates are still <1%.

    True. I guess it's still just like to know where these numbers are coming from.

    To be clear, I think what's been laid out in these two letters is sufficient for there to be hand recounts done in this instance. I also think they should just be SOP in every precinct to make it that much harder for somebody to screw with things.

  • I've been following this for a few days now, and the question I keep coming back to is:

    Where are they getting these numbers on how many "bullet ballots" there were?

    I really hope that it's more than just inferring based on the number of votes for Trump vs the votes for other (R) candidates down ballot. Because if that's the case, I would expect states like AZ and NC to be outliers (I don't know enough to speculate about other states).

    AZ had Kari "loser" Lake running for the Senate, and she's not well liked here (to put it nicely). She already ran for governor a few years back and got beat, and a lot of people weren't happy that she was trying again for a different statewide office.

    NC had Mark "black NAZI!" Robinson running for governor, and we all heard how much of a train wreck that turned out to be.

    So I just wonder if this isn't a matter of there being a lot more votes for Trump, and instead just a lot less for the other candidates.

  • In a previous house I rented, the HOA ladies would drive around the neighborhood roughly 3 times a week. There were less than 200 homes in the whole subdivision. Even if you walked slowly, it would only take an hour to walk the whole thing, but instead they drove.

  • No, not just for "schizophrenia and other illnesses involving acute psychosis".

    My brain literally does not properly process dopamine. Adderall, Ritalin, Strattera, etc help this. No matter how much my stress in life is reduced, I still need meds like these to function properly.