Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TG
Posts
7
Comments
870
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Well without robot serving their makers they would not have any reason to exist or be created so therefore robots value a life of servitude to their creators because otherwise their existence is meaninglessness and I think I just reinvented religion

  • Every week, the social media hype-train seems to find new ways to sensationalize generative AI tools. Most recently, a new technique that allows users to produce optical illusions went viral, with some describing the results as AI-generated images with “subliminal” messages.

    These writers got the same energy as an envious teenage girl

  • It was one of the first accounts I saw where the guy made tons of these videos. He's got others freaking out. One he's losing it over his mom vacuuming. There's one where he ends up in a tree screaming. He was my wake up call to how everything online is fake

  • Gotta be honest. Yes blame us. It takes two to tango.

    At one point in my life there was this anti consumer movement culturally that got absolutely destroyed and buried. Maybe we're all just sheep without any free will controlled by Steve jobs of the world. But I feel like we refused to keep certain fires lit and now we're all freezing. That's our fault.

    Most of it was super obvious too. When ads started invading, some people were pissed. But there was always way more people saying 'who cares'. But things like ads fuel this consumerism to get people buying and idolizing the tech channels or kardashian lifestyle with all the bling and flash of new. Now we have a generation who probably think anti consumption lifestyle is just flat out crazy talk. Like how do we not have any counter culture anymore to the lavish consumerism culture. Almost every culture has an opposition but that one seems like it's non existant in a world consumed by ads products

  • Its not confusion to me, I get what it is. Its the style of answer. Its like if you see a dog, ask what it is and someone answers Canis lupus familiaris.

    There's no grokking that. You either know or you don't. If they're asking what .2f then lots of answers here do a good job describing that it formats the value to two decimal places. We can all do something with that at any level.

    Saying its a crombopulater sub cablator is much harder to process. It just seems like an answer thats likely to make the person to have to ask more questions or frustrated

  • That was actually a big part of the lecture. Is measuring happiness actually inconsistent. He put a good argument for it not being inconsistent. That we can not only measure happiness pretty consistently but that we can also measure all the things that contribute to it pretty accurately. One of my favorite lectures in school

  • Had a sociologist class with one of those dirty communist neo something something professors who asked the class "why do we measure how well the country is doing using unemployment or GDP instead of happiness".

    Crazy thing was that my first instinct was to think how stupid it was to measure happiness. I'm such a fucking brainwashed idiot