Definitely a chemtrail, specifically phenolphthalein.
They were most likely testing the pH effects of their prior chemtrail operation (those fake clouds). The Pink color indicates that the area is basic as opposed to the atmospheres usual acidic state, under acidic conditions it would be colorless.
Edit: down votes already rolling in from the group of gangstalkers they have on my case smh. I will not be silenced!
I think you have a very different perspective from me on what OP was asking and what this thread is.
Indeed it seems so. I read it more as
OP: "I believe porn can ruin your mind and sex habits, how do we acknowledge this without delving into conservatism on the issue."
You: "wtf porn doesn't ruin your life, you're in a rabbit hole and your entire premise is wrong"
Me: "Porn can ruin your life, why would you suggest it can't? Look at gooners"
...
I feel you have to actually understand and acknowledge the real potential effects of pornography in order to find the line between recognition of harmful effects and conservatism.
Hence why people didn't vote for Democrats. They had no reason.
and there was only one way to effectively do that.
Do you think it was about voting democrats. You just think they should be able to do literally whatever they want, including genocide.
they're just posting memes about how everyone didn't push back against the democrats hard enough
More like they're posting about how the Democrats should have listened when we were posting the same things before ethe election, but you not only willfully ignored us, you distanced yourself. Now that it over and we were right, you're mad at the messenger.
"Oh, you're mad that you have to work 12/7 to stay alive? Well, have you considered that peasants didn't have good healthcare?!? Hah, I bet you didn't... Wait, you can't afford healthcare either?...well, you'll suffer and die from a modern illness rather than shitting yourself so you still aren't allowed to complain! It's all perfect now!"
I didn't say you invent those phrases, I said that you harshly dismissed them with no recognition of the limited truth they hold, so why would you expect me to know you recognize the nuance?
How can I "put some ridiculous binary statement" in your mouth when I'm just reacting to the binary you already presented.
It like if someone says " all drugs are bad because they ruin your life".
and you say "wtf that's not true, drugs don't ruin your life" without mentioning that you're only talking about some drugs.
Obviously I'm going to point out that, no, drugs can ruin your life if you partake in them the wrong way, because drug addicts do have a problem and you dismissed it through ignoring it, even if that's not your intention. I can't know your hidden intentions, only what you post.
you shouldn't assume even your starting framework is agreed upon
Why wonder about people who think porn stunts their sexuality (still wtf?!?)
You mentioned it multiple times but the only things you said about these statements were harshly dismissive and didn't provide any sort of nuance so why would it be ridiculous for me to respond as if there wasn't nuance in your opinion? I don't know what's in your heart/mind, only what you say.
Isn't blue sky made by the same people who made Twitter?
It makes sense that people who are leaving twitter because of Elons changes are nostalgic and see that the old Twitter people made a new one so they jump in. Basically name recognition.
Joining the "not op" train since I have a different answer than the others: I was peak annoying/edgy "debate bro" atheist and I ultimately became religious again but for a different religion.
Can elaborate if you want, I just don't want to risk going on an unprovoked tangent lol.
TIL: that a religious belief dating back hundreds/thousands of years (that humans consented to take the "test of life") is really just Russian propaganda from 2014.
That's what makes it good imo.