TheHarpyEagle @ Theharpyeagle @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

620

Joined

2 yr. ago

It always baffles me to say she's unqualified when she objectively has more relevant work experience than Trump.

Also the "try to sound black" part is just... there's a lot to unpack there.

Need one of those geoguesser guys to figure out where this is

I agree that most people won't care but take issue with calling them "dumb". Everyone has a limited amount of time on this planet to build skills and chase hobbies. A lot of people on this site have tech-related jobs and hobbies, so of course this matters to us. I might expect someone who buys pre-built gaming PCs to keep this on their radar, but the vast majority of folks who use computers as email and social media machines, including those who only use it for data entry type jobs, have little reason to care about the specifics of their CPU or any other single component of their computer. If their computer breaks, that's annoying, but that's life. They'll spend the same amount on a new laptop as we might spend on a new CPU and get on with their day.

I don't know what brand of spark plugs are in my car, and maybe a mechanic or car enthusiast would find that dumb. But hey, I'm too busy caring about my CPU to spend time worrying about my car unless it breaks.

I have some issues with WaPo's reporting at times, but honestly, how do we expect to fund quality journalism if we never pay for news?

According to Samsung SDI's VP, automakers are interested in its solid-state battery packs because they are smaller, lighter, and much safer than what's in current electric cars. Apparently, they are also rather expensive to produce, since it warns that they will first go into the "super premium" EV segment of luxury electric cars that can cover more than 600 miles on a charge.

Apparently not, though this is all marketing speak

I've installed Mint on pretty much any old machine I can get my hands on. Right now I'm using it with KDE as my daily driver and couldn't be happier.

I'd say for most people coming from windows, there's little in the way of expected functionality that would be included in other distros.

• signed, a Mint simp

It's sickening that this is a for-profit school siphoning tax money only to abandon the people depending on them. I worry that if the awarded damages aren't enough or they settle, this lawsuit will just be the cost of doing business and nothing will change. These parents drove across the country to visit their son, not every family can or wants to do the same. Who knows what else is going on behind closed doors.

And they don't have any oversight or registration as a boarding school or a special needs school? How the fuck is this legal?

Part of the problem is that we have relatively little insight into or control over what the machine has actually "learned". Once it has learned itself into a dead end with bad data, you can't correct it, only work around it. Your only real shot at a better model is to start over.

When the first models were created, we had a whole internet of "pure" training data made by humans and developers could basically blindly firehose all that content into a model. Additional tuning could be done by seeing what responses humans tended to reject or accept, and what language they used to refine their results. The latter still works, and better heuristics (the criteria that grades the quality of AI output) can be developed, but with how much AI content is out there, they will never have a better training set than what they started with. The whole of the internet now contains the result of every dead end AI has worked itself into with no way to determine what is AI generated on a large scale.

Yeah okay okay BUT half of the (US) population is actively fighting any attempt to speed up adoption of renewables and artificially slowing our progress for the benefit of oil/gas/coal companies and those who make parts for ICEs. Yeah changing things over night isn't going to happen, but constantly threatening to take us out of the Paris Agreement isn't helping.

You really should look through the Haus of Decline gallery, dude comes up with the most cursed comics. One of my favorites:

https://www.hausofdecline.com/comics/gay/21/62d37f4a7261febd442a4cb2

Again, they can, but it's less likely. It really depends on how much the genuine threat of civil unrest and violence compares against whatever benefit they get from voting a certain way (which, in perfect world, would be nothing).

Truthfully I don't think this particular ruling was incorrect or outside the reasonable extent of their powers. Do I think the timing of it was motivated by corporate and political greed? Absolutely. It's abundantly clear that the decision, popular among conservatives, was meant to serve as a Trump "win" based on the justices he put in place (again, disturbingly contrary to the intended purpose of the SCOTUS). It's also a potentially dangerous decision to make without any time allotted to get critical regulations codified by congress.

That all being said, while I in no way trust in the impartiality of the current SCOTUS, I do think repealing a law without fairly universal bipartisan support is a decent bit more extreme than what they did here. I think there needs to be a balance between genuine, concerning possibilities and doom-and-gloom panic.

In theory that was supposed to be the strength of SCOTUS, that being secure in their employment for life (or until retirement), they had no incentive to judge along party lines for fear of future prospects. However, we've seen that judges can still be both very partisan and entirely unqualified and we can now do nothing to remove them. Turns out bribery and threats still work on them

I honestly agree with the decision in a vacuum, but in reality I can't help but feel the decision was made very much with corporate interests in mind. Yeah congress should've gotten their ducks in a row long before now, but the real winner here is corporations, not constituents.

Here's my understanding as a layman, please correct me if I'm wrong.

SCOTUS could block the creation of a law if it was deemed unconstitutional, but even with a conservative SCOTUS, it's unlikely they would in this case. As in many cases, SCOTUS didn't overturn a law here, but rather changed their decision on the interpretation of the law, specifically the Administrative Procedure Act. If congress passes a law that explicitly delegates certain powers to agencies, or codifies regulations that had previously been defined by an agency, that would be harder to fight since the APA, as far as I can tell, does not prohibit it. Warren's bill is basically saying "if we can't implicitly delegate power to agencies to create regulations, we should at least be forced to quickly review suggested regulations to prevent them from getting stuck in congress."

Again, this is just my understanding as a layman. IANAL

People have called her and Biden "Joe and the Hoe", have implied she slept her way to the top, have called her a diversity hire, have invoked the heritage project to oust her. So yes, they've gotten racist and sexist very fast.

I have the opposite experience, I only watched it a couple years ago and thought the hype would totally kill it for me, but I actually ended up really enjoying it and EoE in particular stuck with me. I loved the idea that love is born of the risk we take of truly being known by other people.

I will say that the quality of the Netflix dub probably helped a lot. I know they changed some translations which kinda sucks, but overall the voice acting is so much better. No hate to Spike Spencer, he's obviously a very prolific voice actor, but I think his performance of Shinji is at least part of why people thought he was so whiny. We were originally going to watch through the rebuild movies dubbed, too, but it was so bad we decided to switch to sub.

Yeah, I can get into a series if people say to skip the first couple episodes/seasons because it takes a little to figure itself out (like how you can skip the first season of Parks and Rec and miss nothing of importance), but weird watch order is not something I'll bother with.

I wouldn't bother with anything weird, just watch the series through and then the movies in release order. It might not be "optimal" but I don't think it needs to be. You can skip Death, though, since it's just a recap (there was originally a year between the end of the series and EoE)

Nooo come on, let millennials be the ones to leave this generational war stuff in the past.

I love Kingdom Hearts dearly (beloved) and will be the first to tell you that it makes no god damned sense. I love the characters and many of the themes so much that it hurts to see them get so misused.