I just think theses people(who use AI to make art) does not have enough courage and perfectionism to get into drawing.
"Why bother putting hours in drawing learning, if the magical AI can draw the meme I ask it instantly?"
"Why bother buying a telescope and putting hours in astronomy theory if you can see better space images for free on internet?"
"Why bother doing a marathon, if i can just take my car and go there faster?"
For everything, you need to invest enough of your time in it so start liking it.
The majority of people only have a few hobbies.
They see art as a way to be popular for the nerds who are skilled enough to draw.
They see astronomy as a way to be popular for the nerds who learned astrophotography.
They see sport as a way to be popular for the nerds who are fit enough to run.
For them, one thing that seemed innaccessible, became accessible with AI.
I know it's sad, but theses people don't care if something has a soul or not. They just want their eye-appealing ghibli portrait.
Here's a good blog article that better conveys my point of view.
I invent to myself the most ridiculous stories of things of my imagination and i play them in my head, like a sort of head game.
When i do a sufficiently long story, i often fall asleep on it and i continue it the next evening, and it can last months. Plus you get better at mental visualisation the more you do it.
I remember dreams almost every night since i did that for a long time.
It’s a bit of a nitpick, but I’m not sure I’d use “flow” here. That makes it sound like it’s moving, while the Schwarzchild solution is actually static with respect to a properly chosen time coordinate (and without checking, probably the spinning and charged solutions as well). The spacetime is curved in such a way all timelike (c or slower) trajectories go inwards.
Oh that makes sense. I though it was space time itself which was moving, bringing with it the objects on it. (probably had seen some illustration representing it like that)
But yes the gravitational waves take is interesting, it burn my mind trying to imagine how to "trap" spacetime in itself.
The sloe souotiln is to witre in amanarngs. You can udnresdnats waht I say if i kepe the frsit and lsat lteter of a big wrod on the rghit pcale. You see? It wrkos. Gtota mses up the AI or it smilpy ionrge it.
I just think theses people(who use AI to make art) does not have enough courage and perfectionism to get into drawing.
"Why bother putting hours in drawing learning, if the magical AI can draw the meme I ask it instantly?"
"Why bother buying a telescope and putting hours in astronomy theory if you can see better space images for free on internet?"
"Why bother doing a marathon, if i can just take my car and go there faster?"
For everything, you need to invest enough of your time in it so start liking it. The majority of people only have a few hobbies.
They see art as a way to be popular for the nerds who are skilled enough to draw. They see astronomy as a way to be popular for the nerds who learned astrophotography. They see sport as a way to be popular for the nerds who are fit enough to run.
For them, one thing that seemed innaccessible, became accessible with AI. I know it's sad, but theses people don't care if something has a soul or not. They just want their eye-appealing ghibli portrait.
Here's a good blog article that better conveys my point of view.