TheDankHold @ TheDankHold @kbin.social

Posts

0

Comments

352

Joined

2 yr. ago

I didn’t minimize either. You thinking that shows how incapable of critical thinking you are. I’ve explained it many times and you keep ignoring what I say to continue your lie.

You just can’t help lying and trolling to win an argument that was never made. It’s sad and pathetic.

I see that I’ve explained my position too thoroughly for you to come up new talking points. Maybe at some point you’ll pull your head out of your ass and realize how ridiculous you come across. I won’t hold my breath though. It’s clear that you’d rather feel like you’ve won an argument than actually think about the words you’re lobbing around.

It’s pretty frustrating too because you’re applying your bullish and empty headed reactionary attitude toward a genuinely good cause. Hopefully you get some self awareness later in your life.

Goodbye troll.

I’m not backpedaling from anything you fucking idiot. Claiming public schools should be avoided due to sex abuse cases is just as fallacious as implying the same about Boy Scouts. Which is my point, you’re making a fallacious argument and instead of admitting that you’re talking out of your ass you keep insisting that you were right about the thoughts in my own mind.

You’re so in your own head that you literally can’t fathom my position. So brain dead that your only response is to paint me as an evil person because others you’d have to realize how vapid you are as a person.

Thanks for confirming that you’re not stupid, just so up your own ass that you insist upon my position after I’ve explained to you what I mean.

You haven’t called out shit. Just threw some disgusting accusations my way when I’ve already explained my position to not involve that shit.

You’re a close minded, cynical, and despicable person that thinks avoiding generalizations means you oppose legal action against crimes. Fuck you you empty headed clown.

Every victim that receives justice is a victory. Don’t ever accuse me of thinking otherwise you pathetic troll.

It’s not whataboutism. I’m taking issue with the logic you use and pointing out that extending the logic means you should feel similarly about public education. The entire argument is a fallacy so I was hoping that by showing your logic through another lens you’d see how ridiculous it is.

Are you so bad at reading comprehension that you thought I supported the logic towards school?

do you not want children to be safe? do you not want the sexual abuse investigated so the truth can be broughtto light? Do you not realise that rugsweeping these crimes will enable & empowwr abusers ?

Fuck you for putting such disgusting words in my mouth you bad faith creep. Pointing out your logical fallacy doesn’t mean I disagree with the prosecution, that’s your own cowardly attempt to avoid my actual point.

Absolutely despicable.

Do you think only rapists and murderers go to prison you empty headed creep? Cool your bloodlust and try to value human dignity.

I hear there’s a lot of sex abuse in schools too. Do you think no one should go to public school or do you want to think about how logical your generalization is?

Any organization that congregates children together will attract predators, to think otherwise is naive. The solution isn’t to never let children do anything though.

As an Eagle Scout, the troop I was a part of took protocol very seriously when it came to adult-child interactions.

Unlike the Catholic Church they don’t shuffle around offenders because they aren’t that monolithic of an organization. Thus I find your depiction to by myopic, cripplingly cynical, and deceptively sensationalized.

It’s because when the current system is unsustainable people start to promote other ideas.

I get that you need to infantilize the position to stay so flippant but unfortunately for you it’s more childish to resort to insults when you can’t come up with any other response but still feel the need to say something.

Agree with everything except it being an extension of the Roman Senate. By the time Constantine declared it the state religion the senate had been all but banned from important offices due to the changes that occurred to end the principate phase of the empire.

In reality it was a subversion of Roman governance as the pope gained the authority to “legitimize” emperors and is a primary reason alternative religious beliefs were suddenly all stamped out after centuries of moderate tolerance.

If Israel is any indication, oppressed groups are just as likely to oppress when power is acquired. Your belief otherwise is evidence to f your own bigotry. Humans are humans. Changing the gender doesn’t change geopolitics and thinking otherwise is painfully naïve.

Technologically yes.

Many people still base their morality on mythology from the Iron Age. Blood libel conspiracies still exist.

We didn’t evolve into a better human when we ended the medieval period. We’re still the same apes prone to the same fallacies and environmental pressures.

You just want to feel like you’re intrinsically above this behavior, which is a naive way to view human thought and morality. Given the right circumstances you could easily turn out just like them.

It’s insane how little self awareness you have. They politely correct you and provide information to confirm it and you get pissy and call them a dickhead.

Look in the mirror you dense loser.

Because there was no social media at the time though it would certainly spread slower. And I doubt it would be forgotten given how long the “blood libel” conspiracy has been kicking around and causing massacres throughout history.

You have, LLMs don’t read because they aren’t intelligent or alive. They aren’t comparable to humans.

You finally responded to something I actually said! Congrats on clutching your pearls instead of admitting you were misrepresenting what I was saying.

Also funny that I’ve never engaged in ad hominem but I’ve offended you so much that I’m a “jackass” and should “go fuck [myself]”.

Self awareness really isn’t your strong suit.

Again, how did you read everything I’ve written and act like the conversation is about one or the other? Did you even read what I wrote?

Not to mention you very clearly don’t understand how public transportation works based on where you think it goes between.

Not sure how you came up with this fantasy tbh.

Do you think the working class isn’t going to use public transportation and will all drive? Do you think investing in public transportation means purposefully letting roads degrade? Neither assumption is based on anything I’ve said or in reality in general.

What do you even think my argument is?

The point is that diverting resources to public transportation will reduce traffic by providing an efficient alternative. Then you don’t have to expand roads to accommodate drivers because the bulk of commuters only really need good public transportation to get around.

Do you think that wasn’t possible before? That’s pretty naive. Burn a Bible in medieval Europe and tell me what happens.

So they can use the thinner roads, which will be way less crowded when everyone else that can is using public transportation.

Did you really think this was a coherent response? It’s not like all roads are being removed.

That would require immediate global action against global warming

Show me in the US where there are minorities being paraded through the streets and gang raped. Show me the lynchings happening in the US right now.

Fuck if with your what about bullshit. I can imagine you responding in a similarly flippant manner about a similar occurrence in Rwanda. Because you only care about things to score ideological points.