TheAndrewBrown @ TheAndrewBrown @lemm.ee

Posts

2

Comments

97

Joined

2 yr. ago

Weirdly enough, I’m seeing new posts on my Subscribed feed from all communities without issue but when I view the communities directly, only some of the recent posts show up. Like, I’ll see a post that is a couple hours old on my feed and then go to that community and look at New and it’ll show one or two recent posts but then everything will be from 7 days ago and the post o was just looking at isn’t there.

From other things I’ve seen on other instances, it seems to be a lemmy wide issue that they’re probably still sorting out. Just strange behavior.

To be fair, it would’ve been weirder if he spelled it right in one of the lines and not the rest

This is part of the reasons behind unions. Unions won’t work with companies that use non-union members usually. So they could probably find new (worse) writers but then they’d likely have a hard time getting the old writers back even after the strike. If it was as simple as just hiring new people, union strikes would never work.

He did cry “what’s that”, it seems like that would’ve been pretty loud.

And it seems even more Gandalf’s fault in the book since it was just a single stone falling into water. That has to happen all the time in a cave.

I definitely think the lemmy.world admins have done everything right so far. I’m not sure if there are actually people saying it’s bad for the fediverse but the sentiment I see is that consolidating onto one instance causes you to lose some of the benefits of decentralization. At this point, there are plenty of general instances with open registrations that aren’t experiencing these attacks so it’s best for at least some people on lemmy.world to try to migrate to another instance. For one thing, that persons experience will be better since they won’t see as much downtime anymore, but more importantly it makes lemmy.world less of a target since these attacks are meant to affect as many people as they can. It’ll probably always be one of the biggest instances but the person might decide it’s not worth their time anymore if enough people move to other instances that they’re affecting a small percentage of the whole Lemmy population.

It’s not like the strategically interviewed people they think could give them the anecdotes that were already in the book, the two people that are central to the story (including the person Taron Egerton plays) helped in the screenwriting process. The movie (and I assume the book) are literally about them. They are fully allowed to give out anecdotes for a multiple projects. It’s their life, they can tell as many people as they want.

Sure it’s possible Apple did that, but it’s not about what’s possible, it’s about what you have evidence to prove. It’s also possible this is someone looking to get 15 minutes of fame or hoping they’ll not care much and just settle (which is possible). Or maybe they’re just bitter that they had a good idea but someone else had the same good idea and made way more money off of it. All of those possibilities have equal amounts of evidence supporting them.

I just checked and it’s not happening on one of the other accounts I have signed in. It could be an issue with that one account or instance.

Something I just thought of while typing this is if it’s pulling the list of top posts in the last day and then hiding all the ones I’ve read before, then nothing will show up there until enough newer posts overtake the top ones I’ve already read. But to me it would make more sense to filter out the read posts before pulling the top posts, but that might be a Lemmy thing not a Memmy thing. But that would only be the case if Top whatever pulled a set number of top posts and didn’t pull all posts and sort them by top.

Yeah it is, not sure what might be going on. Thanks for looking into it though!

What makes you suspect the people they hired to provide first-hand accounts wouldn’t have done so? They wouldn’t even need to prove that they did, just the fact they had a source they could’ve gotten the information from would be sufficient, as long as the sources don’t testify that they explicitly didn’t give them that information.

And like I said, the story reads like that without much fluff. He may have been the first one to sell a book written like that but it’s not a huge leap at all. I got the same vibe just from reading facts on Wikipedia.

I’m not sure what your last paragraph means. The author can prove he sent the book to the Tetris Company but I find it unlikely he currently has any evidence that Apple read the book and used it in the screenplay. Tetris could’ve easily immediately rejected the book without reading it because they already planned to sell the rights to someone, in fact that’s very common with large companies, specifically to protect themselves from lawsuits like this.

It might get settled, but that would only be because Apple wouldn’t want the press or there’s evidence that hasn’t been revealed yet.

Some updates here. The Subscribed feed seems to work more consistently, but not always. I just opened up the app (which defaults to All) and it worked but then I refreshed the feed and it said No posts again.

They had multiple people that experienced these things first hand helping develop the script. So even if there isn’t a published article, they easily could’ve just been told by a first hand source.

He submitted the book to the Tetris Company, but Apple is who he’s suing. Also, it’s fairly common for large companies to receive unsolicited materials and reject them without reviewing them in order to protect themselves from lawsuits like this.

But yeah, if any evidence comes up in discovery, that would change things.

I hold him down while I pee so that doesn’t happen anymore. It took one time when it went directly on my shorts for me to adjust my habits so it wouldn’t happen again.

So his claim is just that they copied the “spy thriller” tone of his book? I did a single PowerPoint slide on Tetris last year and got a pretty similar vibe from the Wikipedia page, so I don’t think it’s impossible they came up with that independently. Ultimately I think it’ll be difficult to prove unless there are fictional scenes in both that are fairly similar. Anything that actually happened that’s similar he couldn’t prove they got from his book. All this to say it’s definitely not impossible they were inspired by his book, I imagine stuff like that happens all the time. I’m just not sure he will be able to prove that enough to win.

I’m not sure yet where I stand on using AI to enhance images you made. I think if it’s for commercial purposes, it shouldn’t be ok since it would essentially be profiting off others work.

But in this case, my big issue is they did this without telling their team or bosses. This is essentially no different from hiring a third party to enhance your work so you don’t have to do as much and pocketing the difference. Sounds like they’re updating their guidelines though and I hope this person is fired or won’t be contracted again. They should probably switch the art to the earlier versions in D&D Beyond and future printings too. Which is another thing, the “enhanced” one doesn’t seem better enough to have warranted this type of risk. I’m not sure what that person was thinking.

Yeah I think OP is looking at this from the wrong way. As opposed to a normal game you’ve never played before in which you have to learn the mechanics completely from scratch, with BG3, if you have any knowledge of 5e, you’ll be able to pick it up easier.

Yeah tons of people use the label “bisexual” even though by strict definition they might actually be pan. And that’s totally fine, you don’t always have to use the most specific terminology.

The movie About Time deals with this fact. It’s a great movie if you are ok with romcoms