Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TT
Posts
0
Comments
166
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • That's because you view things like this as isolated acts done by a few people. But don't forget, only 1/3 of US voters tried to stop a man who openly declared himself a fascist, had already had a direct hand in the spread of a world wide plague that killed millions.
    The "they didn't know what they were getting into" excuse is no longer valid. And yet 2/3 of voters were fine with him being reelected . The reason those people weren't dragged from their mansions and beaten to death was because of all the other monsters who were protecting them. The people who weren't committing atrocities themselves, but benefited from it enough to help it keep happening.

  • Gift cards are for people who you are obligated to buy something for, but don't really like enough to put in any effort. They are a way of telling people, "I like this company more than I like you. I could have just given you money, but I couldn't be bothered to shop for you, but I really wanted to make sure that any money I had to spend on you went to this company."
    If you don't believe me, why would they just give you a universal gift card? Did you know that they have been making them right here in the USA for a couple hundred years now? They even have decorative pictures of us presidents on them. And they are not just good in the US, you will find that they are taken most places on the planet.

  • What a horrible way to die... Having to listen to hour upon hour of "confessions" about lusting after couches, and excessively detailed descriptions of couches he had fucked... No doubt at some point the pope was begging to be raptured.

  • You must forgive them young Padawan, they still have fucks to give, or have only recently run out. They are still concerned with the "knowing" of things. It is only once you reach a severe and immeasurable deficit of fucks that you can completely let go of your personal pride and ego enough to admit that this shit is fucking ridiculous and you might as well just let Google/AI remember it for you.

  • Dude, there are at least 4 different "for" loop syntaxes in Js/Ts alone:

    for (let num = 1; num <= 5; num++) {}.

    for (const num of numbers) {}.

    for (const num in numbers) {}.

    this.numbers].forEach(num => {});

    Also don't forget ngFor and @for in html, and then the @for in sass/scss.

    That's 7 different for loops and I haven't included the non-for loops, or even left Angular.

    Once we include some scripting like I did just this week:

    bash: for i in {1..5}: do .. done

    dos: for /L %%i in (1,1,5) do ()

    Then you can just stfu if I feel the need to remind myself of the exact syntax for one of the 3 or 4 different for loop options in c#.

  • As a senior programmer I can't write a for loop without the internet.
    I can't remember the last time I saw a job listing that didn't expect me to be an expert in at least 5 languages. The best part is that halfway through the interview you learn that they are no longer using half the languages listed, and are "transitioning" towards 2 others that aren't even listed. You want me to whip out examples written in Fortran, C++, Rust, JS, and some random word you claim is a language in 2 hrs without the internet? Bitch, I don't even think I could get prewritten "Hello World" examples compiled in 5 different languages in 2 hrs, much less on machine that I have never seen before.

  • Your meta analysis link is about mood, and not energy levels.  I know in layman's terms most people conflate the two, but this is a scientific paper so they're not the same.  And your other link is an article by someone mixing medical terms with layman's terms to come up with something incorrect. This is why people are losing trust in science, it's because of stuff like this where people misinterpret scientific results to try to get as many views as possible.
    You know people can easily do this experiment for themselves right?  In fact, I do it most days at about 2:30.  As my blood sugar drops after lunch and I start to get tired and unfocused I will often have a piece of fruit or small piece of candy.  Do you really need a scientific paper to see there is something askew with what you are saying?  If so, here is your scientific paper:

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3820066/.

    The sugar snack condition was associated with significantly higher tension after 1 hr, and a pattern of initially increased energy and reduced tiredness, followed 1 hr later by increased tiredness and reduced energy.

  • That's only sort of correct. It's only true if you narrowly define hyperactivity as some very specific condition. The studies clearly say that people can experience a "sugar rush" after consuming sugar. The problem is that "sugar rush" is exactly what most people mean when they say hyperactivity. Hyperactivity as in activity that becomes hyper. Hyper as in "above or excessive", activity as in "doing stuff". So, "doing excessive stuff".

  • There are plenty of things that you deal with on a daily basis that are significantly more dangerous than asbestos. And if it had been treated like the hazardous material that it is as soon as we knew it was hazardous, then it would still be used just like all the other hazardous shit we deal with daily. However, as is the usual story, companies not only hid what they knew, but outright lied about its dangers. They called it a miracle material with no downsides. And it is amazingly good at what it does, so it was put in fucking everything, much like AI is today. And so people died for profit. A lot of people.