We don’t want to censor unpopular views, and we also don’t want to harbor the hateful content that sparked this post. Please continue to report and let us know.
With conservative communities, you don't take this risk by avoiding them. They harbor disinformation and harmful content, even if it isn't expressed in a direct way. In our current context, they are harmful by nature.
Even if these communities did not exist, we would still encounter their viewpoints (conservative) in other contexts, one way or another. For example, a discussion about unionization in video games within a gaming-related community will still include their views.
No problem with a community promoting Breitbart, FoxNews etc ?
Theses sites are respecting the rules ? There is no bigotry, lgbtphobia, etc in them ?
This is 100% no hurting content ?
...
Ok good to know.
Oh yeah agree.
I was solo player back then with no internet in any case. Except for LANs.
When I played online to a fps, moh was already done like you said, and I started with CS and battlefield after. I just discovered CoD with black ops because my mates were on it.
I preferred Medal of honor during the time of CoD2, or I just had access to it with GameCube.
On PC I got performance issue on CoD2 or 3 doesn't remember so never played it.
And after it was only online gaming. Ive start and finish my CoD era on BlackOps. Preferred battlefield as license during those times too.
Yeah, this polarized world between Russia and USA is tiring.
We have no choice to make our propers decision, according to "our values", to make them stopping this.
At one moment, they cannot be (the US) in war with the entire world.
Even they abuse their autority on the dollars, etc, at a moment, that will not work anymore,
StarTrek, the communist TV show with a large audience in the same time 😂
After the profile being checked,
My mind : OP is at worst a troll, just here to make reals fights arguments unintteligible for non-LGBTQIA+, or they are at best, just a mix of "trans", fascists, MAGA, with a big lack of culture ofc.
I really tend for the first Option, unfortunatelly,
But all of that takes a long time to explain. In the heat of an argument on the internet, it’s much faster to just say that if someone thinks AI means Cortana from Halo, they play too many video games.
But in the meantime :
Allow Me to talk about one more science fiction story. The Measure Of A Man, from Star Trek. The episode depicts a trial held to determine whether Commander Data is a person, or property. The case made by Commander Riker in the episode is that Data can’t be a person, because he’s so different from us humans. His body parts can be detached. He can be switched off. He doesn’t have emotions. If he’s different to us, then he can’t be intelligent. He’s just an object.
Tech investors are definitely not doing that. They don’t want to see a neat toy guess what they’re thinking. They want artificial human beings that work for free. And that dream is nowhere near complete. I think it’s impossible; I think a true artificial human would have the same drives that make humans want pay as a necessary part of its intelligence. Or maybe it would be a communist, say money is pointless, and then murder its capitalist creator. That’s what happened in a lot of science fiction stories.
Judging the "idea of communism" on science fiction, based on totalitarism + imperialism systems, depicted on sci-fi...
And the only part where they do talk about humans being the product for the AI models ... :
With simple logic trees, Akinator can easily determine the question to ask you which will help the most with guessing your character. He’s applying very simple judgement, but doing so with an efficiency and scale beyond human minds. As a kid playing with Akinator, it was obvious he had a form of intelligence. He’s synthesising information and making accurate judgements. It’s just that he can only make those brilliant judgements about useless trivia.
Not a good article, self-oriented.
Click bait, not really talking about AI and their deniers.
Just what they think to know...
![TGhost [She/Her]](https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/d859c3b2-d896-42be-9ba1-ad5d4cb011ab.png?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
With conservative communities, you don't take this risk by avoiding them. They harbor disinformation and harmful content, even if it isn't expressed in a direct way. In our current context, they are harmful by nature.
Even if these communities did not exist, we would still encounter their viewpoints (conservative) in other contexts, one way or another. For example, a discussion about unionization in video games within a gaming-related community will still include their views.