Syntha @ Syntha @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

278

Joined

2 yr. ago

Have you ever heard of the concept of a pilot study?

It's precisely because of their agriculture sector that Ukraine won't be allowed into the EU.

That's not for you to decide

What do you mean "for the world"? It's being developed for Europeans, by an EU agency that is funded by EU citizens.

Uses US engine

It doesn't even sound like he was the one who released it. He stole to sell them, they don't say he distributed it online, so probably someone bought it off him and ripped it. What a dumbass

Please actually read the article

The company was originally established by Max Levchin, Peter Thiel, and Luke Nosek in December 1998 as Fieldlink. Later it was renamed Confinity,[9] a company which developed security software for hand-held devices.[10] When it had no success with that business model, it switched its focus to a digital wallet.[11] The first version of the PayPal electronic payments system was launched in 1999.[12]

In March 2000, Confinity merged with X.com, an online financial services company founded in March 1999 by Elon Musk, Harris Fricker, Christopher Payne, and Ed Ho.

Musk founded a company that merged with the company that invented PayPal.

PayPal was not founded by Musk

Africa actually does seem to be the most likely impact if it were to hit. The predicted impact would be along the equator.

2. assumes that domestic producers can produce with similar costs as their international competitors, which obviously isn't the case in most circumstances. In fact, the entire point of tariffs, that are meant to protect domestic industry, is raising domestic competitiveness. If they'd already be equally competitive to international producers, tariffs wouldn't do much.

"It doesn't happen to me, so it must not be a real thing"

BRICS delusion strikes again

He will get a preemptive pardon so it doesn't matter.

The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources

So as I understand it, under the OSI definition of the word, anything distributed under a copyleft licence would not be open source.

So all software with GNU GPL, for example.

Do you think that was because of the ban on the NSDAP or because of the unconditional surrender, execution of influential personnel and subsequent occupation of Germany?

I'm talking about the Beer Hall Putsch. Not the end of WW2, as that would 80 years ago.

And as we all remember, when the Nazi Party was banned 100 years ago, the problem was solved, just like that, and nothing at all happened afterwards.

That's not a counterargument lmao are you serious?

Holy non-sequitur

Perplexity is really good, I love using it.