No, they definitely asked the wrong question. If they ask "how can I do [thing]", it assumes it's possible to do [thing]. But if they can't do [thing], the question is invalid, and there is no correct answer.
Honestly, the way you put it, it's like they don't actually want to fix the problem. They just want their solution to be right. Anyone who doesn't tell them what they want to hear is the REAL problem, even if what they want to hear is a lie.
See, that's the point of the XY problem. They asked the wrong question.
Playing Dragon Age in D&D simply would not work. Even after a significant amount of effort, you'd either end up with something entirely unlike Dragon Age or something that barely resembles D&D. So I have to tell them "no" or I'm lying. And if someone stops listening and considers me hostile because I'm not willing to lie to them, then it's absolutely on them.
I have seen people try to add systems to D&D to let them play Dragon Age within the system. I have then turned my head to the left and looked at the Dragon Age RPG on my shelf. If you want to play Dragon Age as a TTRPG, I'll tell you the easiest way to do that. No gutting, no retrofitting, no ship of Theseus...
I understood you. It just sounds horrible. Sorry, no, it's actually worse. Side stories are part of the story, so it goes without saying they should have the same designers as the rest of the story. If you think they don't count, that's worrying.
This is called the X/Y problem. You ask "how do I use X to do Y", and the answer is you don't. You don't even want to. You want to do Y, and just assumed that X is how you'd do it. So the answer might actually be "don't use X."
To some people, they see your question as "How can I do [thing] in [game that does not do thing]?" Since they see it as an inherently flawed question, they try to fix your root issue and explain how to do [thing]. It's not the answer you wanted, but it might be the one you need.
I will admit, some people just like to shit on [game you're playing], and will take every opportunity to hype up [game they're playing]. But just as often, I see people defending [game they're playing] just because they're already playing it. And there is no harm in playing multiple games.
I have a game on my shelf built for pure fight scenes that can't do downtime (Panic at the Dojo), and a game built for wholesome slice-of-life that doesn't let you do combat (Golden Sky Stories). They simply cannot do what the other does, and I wouldn't like either of them as much if they did.
That sounds horrible, personally. The world, story and characters should all reflect one another, so they should all be designed by the same people. Using AI to cheap out on the story is how you get rubbish stories.
I had to google, and apparently there's an indie series that just came out on youtube called Murder Drones. It took me just a second of looking at a thumbnail to say "yup, this is the kind of thing that gets an internet cult but does nothing for me."
Yes you can. There might be consequences, but that will always be the case. If obeying orders breaks the law, and disobeying orders breaks the law, then you're a criminal either way. Might as well do what you agreed to do when you joined the military: risk your life to defend the constitution.
If the law disagrees, the law is wrong and should be broken. And if that leads to a punishment, just remember that someone is being ordered to punish you, and they can defy those orders too.
Yeah, if anything, they're MORE important in a gritty game with death and racism. The further a campaign is likely to go, the more you need to know what's "too far".
I'm honestly pretty tired of "horny bard" jokes. Yes, bards are horny, but so is just about every other class. Why do you think a wizard spent hours learning how to charm people? Have you ever seen a paladin with chastity as one of their tenets? Warlocks are into magical findom. Monks have mastered the Open Palm with quick motions. And we all know what druids are getting up to.
Just gonna say it: paladins have the most perverse class features. Lay on hands, aura of courage, immunity to disease... "Give me a Con save against STI." "Don't worry, I brought (aura of) protection!"
I'd just turn it into a running joke that roughly 50 different bandits have the same picture of the same woman in a locket, and another 30 keep sending money to the same "mother". Then I'll make a cult where the phrase "For the light in my darkness" is some twisted mantra.
Those helmets were never worn outside of ceremonies, and those clothes are more victorian than medieval. And while the background does look olden style, there's no reason a place can't still look like that in the modern day.
There's more to say this isn't medieval than to say that it is.
Susaga @ Susaga @sh.itjust.works Posts 5Comments 537Joined 2 yr. ago
No, they definitely asked the wrong question. If they ask "how can I do [thing]", it assumes it's possible to do [thing]. But if they can't do [thing], the question is invalid, and there is no correct answer.
Honestly, the way you put it, it's like they don't actually want to fix the problem. They just want their solution to be right. Anyone who doesn't tell them what they want to hear is the REAL problem, even if what they want to hear is a lie.
Do you want me to lie?