Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SU
Posts
0
Comments
252
Joined
6 mo. ago

  • Farming Simulator 25 - realistic modern farming

    Coral island - chill life sim

    Graveyard keeper - story with lots of farming and crafting sim elements

    some Minecraft modpacks are farming focused

    Ranch Sim - farming/hunting/homesteading mix

    Farming Dynasty - euro farming sim

    Garden Life - chill, grow flowers, decorate your garden, etc.

    Hard to say where the line is for 'looking like anime' but for things that are a bit stylized but not anime styled exactly, there's also Staxel, the My Time At __ series, and some others.

  • Ask why.

    Need to learn X? Ask why. Why you want to do it might point to a better way of getting what you really want. Asking why one does something in doing X will tell you how process relates to result, informing better decisions.

    Did somebody do something wrong? Ask why. Whether it was because they misunderstood or were just an ass, you'll know better what to do with them.

    Wondering what happened? Asking why will usually get you the who, what, where, when, and how as part of the answer.

  • Agree

    Jump
  • For a certain definition of PR, this is true. Most of the cultural associations of the seasons come from 'classic' literature, most of which, in the English-speaking world, came from England and New England. How many places in the Southern US actually get a leaf colour change in fall? The cultural touchstones defining the associations of seasons were written in places where the winters are dreary and cold and summers are a bit hot sometimes but not usually too horrible, and certainly not likely to kill you. Try telling someone living in the South of the US that summer is the best season, see how many warning shots they fire past your nose.

  • Plasma - a wildly programmable physics game where you can build just about anything in a fairly accessible manner. The devs eventually just made it free because it wasn't getting much notice.

    BPM: Bullets Per Minute - at some point everyone thinks 'what if you combined an FPS with a rhythm game so you had to shoot on the beat?' BPM is that, nailed. Others have tried but BPM got it right.

  • What's going to hit will be a bit dependent on where your soft spots are.

    Kids: Grave of the Fireflies or Bridge to Teribithea or My Girl or The Cure

    Romantic love: The Fountain

    Existential trauma: Psycho-Pass (series) or A.I.

    Dogs: Marley & Me or Hachi

    Loss: Up

    Also:

    River

  • Derek doesn't look like that at night. You're seeing him because he's out during the day after a full work shift. How good are you going to look if you have to stay up until 03:00 for an appointment?

  • Making intentions known is necessary. Flirting is just one of the preocesses by which intention is established. In that way, it is not strictly necessary, in the same way that cake is not necessary, but food is.

    Flirting is a process which intentionally leaves ambiguity because it lets people avoid embarrassment. Being rejected, in many cultures, is embarrassing. By attempting flirting, a person can show interest indirectly, and the other person can show interest in return or show disinterest with quiet cues that let the instigator pull back without having to do something as vulnerable as explicitly stating intentions or experience embarrassment at being directly rejected.

    Flirting, like anything else, can also be used as a display of quality, the verbal/intellectual equivalent of peacock feather displays.

    How necessary these elements are is entirely contextual. Some partners despise the pretense of it. Others view it as incredibly fun. Some are deeply embarassed by the prospect of rejection. Some are not bothered by it at all.

  • I'm not such a fan of this view anymorr. Many of the people who go into the military actually believe they are going to do good things for the world but are ignorant of how much evil they will be asked to do most of the time, or like the idea of being of service but can't get into other, better forms of service because those organizations prefer those who have gone to a university or work on a volunteer basis.

  • Here's the fun thing about that question; it's basically 'Would you date someone you considered mentally insane?' Whether you are atheist considering dating Hindu, a Catholic considering dating a Zoroastrian, or a Buddhist dating a nihilist, this is a person who has a fundamentally different understanding of reality. Here's the real kicker; 'Is someone who has a distorted sense of reality capable of giving consent?' Can you even date them if you value consent?

  • The short of it is: western society has been pretending human behaviour is simple and easy to understand for ages, but can't anymore, and that's leading to a fight over how to think about it all.

    Homosexuality was viewed as a choice. Gender was viewed as natural rather than cultural. Criminals were just evil. Addicts were just irresponsible. Etc. Etc. In the last century, the democratization of expression and the shift to individualism has shattered that illusion of homogeneous simplicity.

    This combines with a primitive delusion of semantic authority (this word has a specific defined meaning, and it is the one in the dictionary/my head) so that people think the object is determined by it's descriptors rather than the descriptor is defined by its context. People hear a word (e.g. man) and assume all the common entailments are mandatorily part of the definition. (e.g. penis, taller and broader than average, likes to have sex with women, likes to hunt/fight/sport, wants to be a father and provider, insert other cultural signifier of masculinity here) So, when someone sees a word being applied to someone, but doesn't feel like the definition in their head matches, they feel it's wrong. (e.g. He likes men. That doesn't match my definition of 'man.' Could my understanding of the word 'man' be wrong? Of course not. They must be something else. 'You there, stop calling yourself a man. You're not.')

    The current battle is a battle to define what the next concensus will be for the definition of various words. Traditionalists want to go back to a more familiar way of defining things. (e.g. It had a penis at birth? Man. And he better act like one.) And they are willing to happily ignore the preferences of people who don't feel like that definition matches theirs. Neogenderists (for lack of a better term) believe something is wrong with the gender concepts and want to change them, whether that means adding one neuter gender, adding 100 genders, limiting us to the traditional two genders but removing physical sex as a characteristic in favor of just the cultural elements/secondary characteristics, or seeking to abolish gender entirely. Some people are interested in making the language match people's self-conceptions, some are not.

    And all of this is still in flux. Who knows which group will be most prominent in 10, 20, 30, 100, or 1000 years? We could have a time in the future where people will die to fight for the idea that there are exactly four genders, 'man,' 'woman,' 'human,' and 'steve,' differentiated mostly by hair color, with entailments regarding preferences for spicy foods, appropriate toenail length, and room temperature, and that the people who want to dye their hair are transchromists. We'd all like to believe humanity would have the wisdom to avoid it, but looking around doesn't inspire much hope.

  • It discourages the use of muscle memory altogether. One of the things that make it so good is that it requires focus. It's not the sort of game you play while listening to music or second-screening a show. It doesn't ask much, just a bit of care and attention, but it takes all of it.