Skip Navigation

Stoneykins [any]
Stoneykins [any] @ Stoneykins @mander.xyz
Posts
0
Comments
320
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Neither does weed but that's illegal. And, drinking too much alcohol destroys your body and kills you. The legality of a substance doesn't really align with what things are healthy and safe to consume.

  • Im doin this. Chop some golden raisins into tiny pieces, mix them into some good mac and cheese, possibly with other added things in it to make them blend in better, and serve it to my family, see if they even notice.

    Idk why I want to do this tbh, but I am filled with dreadful curiosity...

  • Timmy already made the wish for caffeine and we are just unaware that our reality was changed from one where coffee was illegal

  • If you want my opinion, the biggest keystone flaw in their thinking is being so ready to support/defend any nation that is or has ever described itself as communist. There is a lot of toxicity from nationalism that leads to things like pro-authoritarianism and advocating military force, and you can see it from nationalists whether they are communist or not.

    Eta: But no, I don't think this kinda stuff is inherent to communism. I think it is common in people who crave the validity of state-backed communism more than they are willing to scrutinize the history and peoples involved with the states they are supporting

  • Long term, yes, I won't deny it.

    Excuse me if this is kinda morbid, but there are people who will never change their minds, and educating the next generation that replaces them to be better after they die is slow.

    What is really needed, as soon as possible, is robust legal protections and rights, any way those can be acquired.

  • Typically the word refers to communists that are pro-authoritarian, pro-military force, and some amount of bizarrely nationalist.

    The word is also, confusingly, used to describe all communists (by people that don't like communists) and several other subcategories. Really, you can't ever guess how someone means it when you see them say it. Some people self-describe as tankie, either because they fully agree with the term, or because people call them that anyways.

    On lemmy, 90% of the time, "tankie" just literally means "someone from lemmygrad or hexbear", which is kinda fairly earned, because that is where all the pro-authoritarian, pro-military force, bizarrely nationalist communists hang out, but to be clear, not all of the people in those communities are like that.

    Also they hate being defined this way. They will ramble for hours about how "anti-authoritarian" isn't real or is counter productive, and more like that. While spamming weird left unity emojis every time someone mentions anarchism...

  • Some people, regardless of how far their views are, can have those views changed.

    Some people, regardless of how close their views are, cannot have those views changed.

    "Changing their minds" is always an incomplete solution to prejudice. It should be attempted, but cannot "solve" the issue culturally.

  • Oh no, what a horrible insult. I'm sure OP will never recover from being told they hug trees, you went too far.

  • I would guess probably! Just less sensitive, I think they put them in fingertips specifically because of the amount of touch sensitive nerves.

  • Actually putting a magnet in your fingertip so you can "feel" magnetic objects is a bodymod I've heard some people do

    But yeah, like @Pons_Aelius@kbin.social said, MRIs probably aren't an option ever again unless you have it removed. I guess removing one from your finger would be easier than everywhere on your body.

    Edit: I should have read the comment section before typing this, people are already talking about it lol

  • That isn't really true, now or ever. It is old, crusty propaganda. It is their excuse for their actions of opposing any and all (useful and fair) government spending, but they really just want to funnel all that same amount of government money, if not more, into the pockets of the people who bribe them. They also obviously don't believe this as far as personal liberties, they want more power with which to control all finances to their own ends.

    None of that is "small" it is better described as "ineffective" or how I see it, "not designed for your benefit"

  • I really disagree. For learning lemmy for average people, big instance is best.

    There is a point where people who stick around are likely to make a new "real" account on a different smaller server, after they know what they want to browse.

    Basically big instances should be like training wheels.

  • For a while I used amazon as a "product browser", I would shop for what I want on there, and then go buy it straight from the manufacturer or whatever online marketplace the seller prefers.

    Now, it has gotten so bad, it isn't even useful for that. Amazon will show you 50 overpriced knockoffs of the thing you'd actually want to buy without ever showing you the real thing unless you already know the brand name of what you want ahead of time. The reviews are useless too now, everything has 4 1/2 stars and the same substanceless reviews.

  • The tech illiterate ones.

    Which, statistically, are mostly the older ones.

  • Fuck credit scores in general, they shouldn't exist.

  • The only people who really prefer coal and gas over wind and solar are the fossil fuel industry. They want to keep their place on top of the energy market, and attempt to do so with lobbying and propaganda, . Wind in solar are more than powerful enough to provide for all our energy needs, and either we will eventually switch to them or be replaced by the people who were smart enough to switch to wind and solar.

  • Excellently written!

    I am so tired of people who have no idea how good wind and solar are/have gotten smugly declaring that wind and solar will never be good enough to meet energy demands...

  • Rule

    Jump
  • It's because it isn't really something that is supposed to be very impactful on an individual basis.

    The trend to push for people trying to eat less meat instead of no meat is because the majority of the population is unwilling currently to give up meat entirely, and are deciding on no changes to their diet when petitioned to try being vegetarian or vegan. But, if you can get most people to eat just less meat, there is a collective impact to the meat industry, and as a bonus, someone who has already agreed to reduce the meat in their diet is easier to convince to cut more meat than someone who has never agreed to change their diet at all.

  • me_irl

    Jump
  • I'm gunna start tho, it's great