SparrowHawk @ SparrowHawk @feddit.it

Posts

1

Comments

174

Joined

11 mo. ago

That would just make the molepeople mad and double our problems

I think all your criticisms are valid, but I sense a generalized vitriol born from disappointment of specific entities or people, while you're criticizing what's possibly the first "big" political for many of those people, and you risk of alienating everyone potentially capable or willing to do more by talking this way. No political community is sustainable if there cannot be clemency for the inadequate actions of ignorant people.

Accountability is important, criticism is important, but self criticism and self accountability are the most important of all.

Acting high and mighty towards the "less politically pure" than you will not pressure anyone into doing more, you might not like to hear it, but to many what you wrote can be equally seen as virtue signalling.

I write this with no animosity, just trying to form a constructive criticism for your justified frustration

Curious abt this too

Do you actually have an idea, or are your just minimizing stuff you don't agree with?

Why are your so angry with the people you are supposed to convince to join you? Or are your just trying to cyinically convince everyone that nothing is possible by criticizing everything that isn't a molotov?

It's everyday my pal

Your point is based on an idealistic and wishful "uncorruot government". You cannot have an uncorrupt government. What's needed is a different form of political decision making, one where the common folk participates in the political questions, not just some answers, where accountability is protected and a priority.

I don't know the exact blueprint for this, maybe it is as unattainable as an "uncorrupted government". What I know is that nobody really tried it yet, while so called "liberal democracy" has proven its failings to all and the fascist have been taking advantage of those failings since the start. The only way yo avoid this is to change our questions, not to all agree on the answers

Don't be sorry, your comment was helpful to me, thank you

Well i was talking about ritalin and equasym actually

To me they only made me incredibly nervous or incredibly sad, i think I might have been misdiagnosed and I'm actually autistic maybe

Yeah I understand, and I like the decision, i hope my sentence example was of help

Generally with animals the "it" pronoun fits best, but i think they phrase itself need reworking, i understand that you can't today say but i think it's a difficult way toc phrase it the way toc wrote it.

Maybe "this is the monkey I suspect is seeing my ears"

Guerrilla tactics work, no one is ever gonna just randomly storm the capitals, that's just kind of naive and reductive

You seem to forget we live in a planet that follows the laws of physics. Capitalism pretends it can bend those laws. But it will not happen

Here with me

We'll see about that.

The world as we know it

I think that the true world war 3 will not be nations against nations, but citizens against their own nations. The stage is set for an actual paradigm shift or system annihilation. We will not support civilization if it doesn't change, either the people destroy the pyramid or the pyramid will destroy the world.

Bad news? We don't want the revolution of 20th century Russia, we live on 21st century earth! Better yet, lets do away with the christian calendar and do 1st century post capitalism.

Wtf

I am drunk Abd just watched evangelion 3.33 so i am emotionally fragile and very mad at reading this shit