Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SO
Posts
0
Comments
223
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • According to a 4yo I know, the only downside of her little friend having two mummies is that poor boy has to draw 2 (two!) Mother's Day cards.

    Yo Mama jokes are yet to arrive at the nursery.

  • In the case of second gen immigrant, former deputy PM and raging thundercunt Dominic Raab it's a case of being too stupid rather than too evil. I mean, he's both, but more stupid, in contrast to Braverman. Sunak is neither, he's just a sociopath with no care to anyone else.

  • Maybe, this sentence, out of context. The rest of the post makes it abundantly clear that the ages of these things go:
    mountains -> bones -> dinosaurs

    The poster may either be a victim of Poe's Law, in which case their "joke" wasn't very funny, or they could be making the logical deduction as you describe but as a mistake. I thought it was the latter.

  • The original sentence is consistent with the assertion that the mountains had formed before the first boney ancestors of dinosaurs evolved. This is also consistent with the presented timeline.

    The correction would mean that the mountains may be older or younger than dinosaurs, because they are only older than bones, and the article is deafeningly silent on the issue of whether dinosaurs had bones.

    It's a failure of literacy on the poster's part, hence the downvotes.