Shikadi @ Shikadi @lemmy.sdf.org

Posts

3

Comments

162

Joined

2 yr. ago

Thank you for following up and posting the link!

I wasn't referring to the case, but turns out I'm wrong anyway. Edited my original comment

That's why we have three branches of government, a constitution, and state rights. Literally any government in bad hands can be abused. It's a senseless argument

First off, 50% of the country believes things that actually have no evidence other than people they like saying it. It's not about different truths, it's about truth and fiction. All you need to do is try and verify claims from first or second hand sources, and that becomes painfully obvious, but people refuse to accept that or be open to it.

Second, nobody is asking to have a partisan arbiter of truth. The supreme court was once non partisan, and they're an arbiter of justice. Even conservatives who are actually capable of researching and following truths come to the same conclusions as the left when it comes to facts. Here's an easy one: Conservatives all over the country claim there was evidence of election fraud. Okay, it's been years, where is the evidence? No where, they didn't even fabricate evidence, they literally didn't submit anything. Any rational person, regardless of their political views, would agree that there is no reason to believe the election was stolen. Trump is going to trial for espionage. Where is the evidence? You can literally listen to some of it on the internet, there are photos, a large investigation with multiple people on both sides of the aisle took place, there were raids and testimony. But there are still people claiming it's a witch hunt and there's no evidence.

It's not even censorship if they just mark things as not true. There's really no reason doing something about it has to be equivalent to full scale authoritarian censorship, so you're walling yourself off from actual solutions with a slippery slope argument that leaves us in the hands of disinformation campaigns, which are easily paid for by rich people and foreign governments.

If they take over it doesn't matter what laws we have. Currently the republican frontrunner plans to expand the power of the president, and previously he packed the court with garbage. That's how they win, not by the government or companies working to fight misinformation.

I wasn't referencing that actually, but turns out it's not true anyway. Edited my comment

Slippery slope to what? We have those restrictions for news already. Only reason you still see Fox and such lie on the air and get away with it is they're classified as entertainment instead of news. Freedom of speech and press are still in tact.

Edit: I wasn't referring to the Tucker Carlson case, but I did learn that's not true anyway. Nobody accredits news channels in the first place, and as it turns out, the FCC doesn't even have any authority over cable.

Yes, that's why they said documents trial?

I read an article from NYT on her that actually painted her in a much better light, despite her overturned ruling. They even talked about how that overturned decision wasn't that unreasonable under normal circumstances. If she ends up being too favorable, she can very quickly be removed. At this point, with all eyes on her, I would imagine she would try to be fair about it. So do I think it's going to be a fair trial? I'd give it a solid maybe.

Lol the mix of windows XP and Vista icons

I also use i3 and volume key maps, the tray icon I use is just called volumeicon and it can be used to switch sources. I think it has optional dependencies to do it though

Thanks! By configure the sway bar, do you mean that it has a way to display the volume? I couldn't find that last time I tried to get things configured and ended up just going back to i3

I should have added that I update one of my arch computers like once or twice a year, and the other maybe 4 times a year. The reputation for having update issues is just as out dated as Ubuntu's reputation for not having update issues

No way to verify accounts, weird paywalling, pay for views, losing tons of money, mostly just that

I'm probably the only one here who doesn't like Debian for desktop lol, stable doesn't have to mean out of date

It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/map

What do you do for a volume icon/volume control?

I haven't had an arch update go bad since 2016, other than a few things that had instant fixes on the home page/mailing list, whereas with Ubuntu I have trouble with every distro upgrade.

I like Fedora's dnf package manager though, it's similar to Pacman. It's been a while but last time I used Fedora I got annoyed by packages being out of date and went back to Arch

It's probably both

Wild catch is fine when quotas are respected

(But they aren't)