Did you not see his response in the primary debates when kamala called out his segregation policies? Rather than admit that it was the wrong decision, he defended it and used the times as an excuse. Just look at his voting record, he's been very conservative over his career. It doesn't matter though, people change, and actions speak louder than words. He's doing good stuff as president and that's what matters right now.
That's a very binary response. I agree that they should be doing more, but I also think it's important to recognize what they are doing. Sweeping change doesn't happen over night, and so far the actions I've seen in Biden's administration lean pretty heavily away from past neoliberal trickle down. The attempted student loan forgiveness, the new head of the FTC, investment in infrastructure and jobs, Tax plans to reverse the cuts and loopholes for the rich introduced by the previous, capping capital gains tax (as in switching to income tax after a certain number is earned), a minimum income tax on people with wealth above $100 million, and much more. All of that is counter to trickle down economics, and some of it is even a reversal from Obama era decisions and Clinton era decisions. Bernie is definitely doing work in his position, a quote from a Guardian article quoting Bernie:
With a hearty laugh, Sanders, 81, recalled that, after the 2020 Democratic primary, his team and Biden’s had joined forces to produce an “agenda for working families”. They did not agree on everything but “put together probably the most progressive outline that any president has introduced since FDR” – a reference to Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal in the 1930s.
So yeah, I despise Biden's past voting record and behavior, and I think we could do better. But it's totally counter productive to act like nothing has changed in this administration without actually paying attention to what's happening, the government is not just the president.
I'm not about to argue that the implementation does enough, but you're willfully ignorant if you don't think the infrastructure bill was exactly that. Also, Republican presidents consistently implement trickle down economics, and at the very least the Biden administration for the most part doesn't.
No, I'm being genuine. It's theoretical and all, but if you were to put up a windmill in the same spot instead of a tower, it's possible traditional air conditioners would be able to cool the building to the same degree while also providing surplus electricity. It's also possible that you wouldn't, and I don't know the answer. It would also be interesting to compare it in different ways as well, like rather than asking "If a windmill was here" we could ask "The energy removed from the wind by the tower", because that would indicate scalability problems if one windmill was indeed able to cool one building, but maybe 100 wouldn't be able to cool 100. All hypothetical, but air conditioners/heat pumps are actually very efficient, so it's possible an active design could be more efficient than a passive one in this situation. At least, until someone does the math
While I agree with you, at least he's behaving reasonably now. I don't like all his decisions but I do like that many of the decisions are being delegated as they should be, and would re elect him against either of the two R frontrunners in a heartbeat. That's not high praise, but I do think his administration is doing much better than I thought it would
Edit: I'm surprised at the number of downvotes on the parent comment, they're not exactly wrong.
It's literally defined as build out from the middle and up from the bottom, how is that the same as trickle down? Or did you miss the part where it has an actual definition?
I'm sad Biden is getting an economic system named after him that he doesn't have much to do with just because he's president. But hey, I'll take it. Reaganomics is awful, and at least having a name for the opposite is nice. Bernienomics doesn't have the same ring to it
Thing is, the risks of doing nothing have definite consequences that we've already been watching. Should we do nothing and let democracy burn in fear that doing something will be abused in the future?
"we're losing rights" or some people you don't like are gaining safety? No rights are lost by combatting disinformation. It's not like someone is just going to go out with a banhammer and say "I disagree so that's disinformation, you're banned"
Did you not see his response in the primary debates when kamala called out his segregation policies? Rather than admit that it was the wrong decision, he defended it and used the times as an excuse. Just look at his voting record, he's been very conservative over his career. It doesn't matter though, people change, and actions speak louder than words. He's doing good stuff as president and that's what matters right now.
Edit: spelled Kamala wrong and I'm embarrassed