Saik0 @ Saik0Shinigami @lemmy.saik0.com

Nope. I don't talk about myself like that.

---

Read more

Posts

1

Comments

1,968

Joined

2 yr. ago

I'm a snipped man... there were a lot of questions.

I don't know who told you "no questions asked", but that definitely doesn't match my lived experience.

I brought up losses, upkeep, AND environmental impact.

All three of these items affect the cost of generation that you're ignoring.

I love how you address only 1/3 of the items I brought up!

I have 0% loss on my house (except for the inverter losses, which the solar farms would incur as well). With 0 trees blocking anything.

Upkeeping massive transmission lines isn't free. Adapting solar to the current grid also isn't free and lossless. Transformers on the road to bring down voltage are a 1-2% loss on their own.

Massive fields of solar has upkeep/environmental costs as well.

If you choose to misconstrue me bringing up valid points as to why we should also be installing solar on buildings as an argument to never install solar farms... that's up to you. But there is value to putting production as close to load as possible.

There is a benefit to putting solar close to the load. Less transmission losses/upkeep.

There is a benefit to putting solar on roofs/buildings... Less environmental impact.

I've only ever played borderlands solo...

Telco providers should be fined for any spam call and -text they don’t prevent from happening.

This would incentivise them to screen/monitor my calls and texts. No thanks.I don't need Verizon turning into google and monitoring/data mining all my shit.

SHAKEN/STIR is about as far as I want them to go. Validate with the call meta data that it's not a spoofed call. Once I know it's not spoofed, I can trust my on device apps to block what I don't want.

This is exactly how I view Doom as well.

If you want lore, put it in the environment. Let people hunt and find it (makes it more rewarding for those people too). But the core gameplay loop of doom needs to not have hours of exposition dump. The whole point of Doom guy is literally rip and tear. Not to give a shit about why he's ripping and tearing. He's a Marine. Simple motivations.

Source:https://doom.fandom.com/wiki/Doom_Slayer

The Doom Marine was originally a human from Earth who served in the Marines and was dishonorably discharged due to assaulting his commanding officer after refusing to fire upon a crowd of unarmed civilians and was later transferred to the UAC Phobos base as security. The Marine soon found himself trying to prevent the demons of Hell from invading Earth. After having fought demonic hordes through Phobos, Deimos and Hell, he returned home to find Earth now overrun by demons. Among the billions of people killed were his family, including his pet rabbit Daisy, giving him further reason to pursue hunting the demons. He continued fighting the horde on Earth, before taking the fight to Hell once more.

There isn't a "reason" outside of pure rage that makes Doom guy. Doom guy would not give 2 fucking shits about "why", just murder and rage.

To tie this back to another topic, Mick Gordon fucking captured it perfectly in the music. No sense for the "norms" of music. Just pure rage in music form. It's cathartic. It was a perfect fit. And they fucked it up.

You'd have VA benefits as a US war vet. You probably couldn't sue. but you would get free singlepayer healthcare

Assuming I am from the US?

I mean... I'd like to see any law that can be construed that directly accessing a URL that's unprotected is illegal. I'm not an expert in EU law on this for sure... but I've read many things pertaining to EU law and never found one that would lead me to believe otherwise.

Ah yes, I patrol lemmy... waiting over a month between posting on the matter... and present some solutions to the problem myself while advocating for a resolution of fixing bad unauthed endpoints?

Also, jellyfin has real downsides to Plex and security is not one of those.

Unauthed endpoints are literally a bigger security issue than anything plex has ever shipped.

No it's not.

doesn't work with auth in front of it

The idea is putting an auth layer in a reverse proxy IN FRONT OF jellyfin. Not adding OIDC into jellyfin itself. Adding any plugin into jellyfin won't fix the unauthed endpoints which would be the whole point of adding another layer of auth.

There are solutions though…

Solution for what? This thread is talking about basic auth breaking jellyfin.

Adding an auth layer IN jellyfin will not fix the unauthed endpoints. We're talking about adding an auth layer BEFORE jellyfin here.

they won’t see any difference !

They also won't know how to use it... how to debug it when it inevitably goes down... etc.

A plus could be to even add your own dns+pihole onto their network and block some of those nasty ads :) !

Yay! more support!

You can also extract and give it to bitwarden as well for those folks using that.

Me, my brother-in-law, and friend all share our libraries with the same elderly relatives.

So grandma would need to switch between all three servers to access all content.

https://websockets.readthedocs.io/en/stable/topics/authentication.html

Maybe your proxy didn't have websockets enabled? Jellyfin does require websockets to function correctly.

Edit: https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/13511

another issue with same "problem" with a major contributor saying "unsupported"

Try logging in.

This is all you'll see. Even if you setup a "guest" account with NO password... it's all you'll see. This is not a Nginx issue.

Edit:

The error appears in Jellyfins toast mechanism... so you know it's not nginx.

Edit2: oh and don't forget to downvote this comment too. I see you :)

Edit3: actually I just realized that you think THIS is nginx's fault...

It is, but it isn't... It requires the wss target on the server to handle it.

Jellyfin doesn't do this. Nginx is passing it properly.

Edit4:

Thanks dad!

Sorry, but nothing uncivil about it. Funny thing though I never called you a shill, troll, shitheel nothing... I just presented a simple rebuttal to your argument... but because it hurts your feelings to be wrong... now I'm all these names. Crazy!

Well then the obvious answer would be that if I had all these sock puppets... wouldn't I just also upvote myself? Wouldn't that make a malicious intent much more effective?

Don't you need to set a static route in your router for that to work?

Hamachi definitely doesn't work on TVs...

I'm going to be mildly honest here...

I did troll a little... In that I kept this one in the back pocket waiting for a rebuttal..

Why set port on UPnP router/firewall if you don't want it accessible to the internet...

So maybe we're both trolls in this specific chain? But I guess I was hoping that there was some common ground to find. I don't know.

Edit: Oh and this one...

Edit2: Decided to gif it because it's an opportunity to rick roll someone...https://lemmy.saik0.com/comment/4667902