S_204 @ S_204 @lemm.ee

Posts

3

Comments

605

Joined

2 yr. ago

Abbott stands for nothing.

You're not allowed to tell Americans that how they want the world to be isn't exactly correct.

Americans even inherently understand this by their nature of forming into their chosen tribes rather than their more historically convenient ones. You see this for left right divide, the rich poor divide along with every other divide in American society.

The classic Anti-Semitic Holocaust inversion. LMFAO. You bigots are so predictable, the Elder's of Zion is about to become a Best Seller again based on your kind.

If Congress decides to stop sending Israel after he speaks to them, then that's something that the American people will have to live with. Including the increase in terrorism and the decrease in American jobs that would come along with it.

No one needs to change the definition when you're working overtime to twist what I'm saying. I never said you needed to be arrested for violating the Constitution. I'm pointing out the clear and obvious fact that Free speech before they make hunger so it is being stifled..

That you're supporting this just shows how fascist the claimed progressives have become in America.. if you're afraid of someone speaking then challenge them with ideas. Don't shut them down. I get that's what you're taught to do on campus now, but that's not an effective way to deal with someone or something you disagree with.

It's absolutely free speech. I'm not saying someone needs to be arrested for violating a Constitution, but the fact that you're supporting the subversion of free speech in Congress is absolutely ridiculous.

It doesn't matter whether the invited party is a citizen or not. They are invited by the speaker of the House once that platform is extended, It's what matters..

I'm hardly concerned with who's the one giving the speech and entirely concerned with the fact the Democratic party is working overtime to stifle Free speech before the American Congress.

Classic Holocaust inversion Anti semitism. Y'all are just so predictable. Can't handle reality so you revert to your classic tropes.

You're showing your lack of comprehension here. I never said said they're violating the Constitution. If that's how you're interpreting this, that's just ridiculous..

I said they're stifling. Free speech which is exactly what they're trying to do.

Sure, you've convinced me, anyone that the speaker of the house thinks deserves that platform should have it then, ally or not.

That you think limiting the ability of people to speak before Congress, isn't stifling free speech is beyond absurd.

Because allowing the speaker of the house to platform an ally who the American people are funding is exactly what the American people deserve.

But instead of having the capacity to listen to a conflicting opinion, people are losing their minds like the choken headed morons they are.

No one is saying free speech is giving the entire world a soapbox wherever they want .

We're talking about someone who has been invited by the speaker of the House to speak in front of Congress. This isn't any random person on a soapbox. This is the speaker of the House of Representatives making an official US government invitation to an ally. Undermining that is absolutely stifling Free speech.

Yes, you're exactly proving my point. You're running away and hiding from people who don't align with your thinking. That doesn't help society. It just puts you further and further into your Echo chamber.

Undermining The US government by scuttling an invited speaker is absolutely stifling Free speech whether you care or not.

No one says they own it, but they are quite literally the speaker of the House. So when they extend an invitation to someone to speak before the American public and that is undermined then they add us quite literally stifling Free speech.

The US Congress is inviting someone to speak before them. An active effort to undermine and subvert that is unquestionably stifling free speech.

I think free speech is the ability for an invited speaker to speak freely in front of Congress. An active campaign to prevent that is absolutely stifling Free speech.

Nowhere am I claiming that they are intending on putting him in jail for what he's saying. That would be illegal. Stifling or subverting the intention of Congress is definitely stifling free speech.

A congressional campaign to stop an invited speaker from speaking is absolutely stifling free speech.

Yes, putting together a campaign to stop someone who has been invited to speak before Congress from doing so is absolutely stifling of free speech.

Thanks for reinforcing my point.