S_204 @ S_204 @lemm.ee

Posts

3

Comments

605

Joined

2 yr. ago

That's not wealthy though. That's maybe well to do or upper middle class.

Wealthy is your children not having a mortgage and also having a trust fund.

I know a guy who's worth over 10 and probably closer to $50 million. He still lives in the same house that he did when he graduated university. He drives a 10-year-old car and his son who is one of my best friends drives the car that he had before that as a handme down.

Some people flaunt it. Some people build it quietly.

This gentleman that I know has bought both of his son's houses cash so they have no mortgages. He owns a million dollar cottage on a beautiful Lake and another property on the panhandle in Florida. You would think that he's on social security though if you just saw him bumbling about his yard.

Typical of your ilk facts are relevant because they don't suit your narrative.

The Free world will continue to focus on reality. Here. The reality is there's a terrorist organization running an enclave right next to the only democracy in the middle East. Those terrorists have spent their entire lives outwardly calling for the death of the citizens of that democracy .

No one in that enclave is being genocided and that's easily proven by the fact that no genocide has ever ended when the hostages were released.

That you're unable to acknowledge these simple facts and this readily apparent reality really just shows how easily people are caught up in the social media cause du jour.

I'd call on you to be better to be less ignorant and to be less pathetic, but you've proven yourself unable to do any of those things.

Facts aren't insanity, denying facts or insanity.

You realize there are Arab judges on the Israeli supreme Court right? Please tell me you're aware that there are over 2 million Arab Israelis living with full rights in Israel.

You're aware of this fact in reality, right?

You seem to think that non-israelis, ones who have openly committed to killing Israelis deserve the same rights and protections as an Israeli citizen, which is an absolutely insane position to take.

https://www.statista.com/chart/31152/share-of-us-respondents-who-have-taken-private-trips/#:~:text=Around%20a%20third%20of%20Americans,the%20other%20hand%2C%20were%20rarer.

1/3 of Americans take multiple vacations a year. Have you tried not being poor? It's worth a shot if you haven't.

America deserves what it elects.

May the odds ever be in your favor.

You realize there's 2 million Arabs living with full rights, some even serving in the IDF in Israel right? Gazans are Arabs, they're not distinct from the Israelis living adjacent, no people's are even remotely close to being wiped out FFS.

You realize that based on the birth rates there's going to be more Gazans after the war than before it right!

So they're ignorant? There's no genocide in Gaza other than the one Hamas attempted in October.

Screen shot this. There's no genocide in Gaza other than the one Hamas has attempted in October.

The system failed decades before that if there's people running around stupid enough to think there's a genocide happening.

But Americans now have what they deserve. The exceptionalism they've been pushing on the world is now on full display for everyone to witness.

Come on. Have you seen what's going on on college campuses right now? I've heard far less serious things being said with absolute sincerity.

We're reaching the point where victimhood is the only trait people aspire to achieve.

You're right, it is very different. The campus encampments are calling for intifada. Calling for violence should not be accepted. That is starkly different from an invitation to a foreign Ally being scuttled by people too afraid to hear what someone has to say.

Yes you can. Just not listen. That's a very good point. Not listening is very different from scuttling the invitation provided by the speaker of the house.

I'm literally claiming reality. Scuttling an invitation from the speaker of the House is absolutely stifling free speech. I've never made the claim. It's a constitutional violation you'd have to be in absolute moron to interpret my comment that way.

There are many ways to stifle Free speech. I see people making that claim regarding the chance for intifada college campuses. Being an expression of free speech. I'm amused and fascinated by the people claiming that shutting down an encampment that's calling for in intifada which is unquestionably. A violent action is stifling Free speech. Well they have issues with a politician being invited to speak before Congress.

Lots of them hang out here LoL.

It's crazy this asshole is going to win again. Biden has done exponentially more for Americans than Trump but he's still going to lose.

Crazy Town. Top to bottom.

The reasoning is abundantly clear. The speaker of the House quite literally by definition is in charge of who speaks before the house. Undermining and subverting the invitation of someone to speak before Congress is absolutely limiting free speech before the American public.

That you're trying to make this a legal argument, proves to me that you understand the problem here. I'm not claiming this is a legal issue. This is a moral issue and the Democrats who constantly claim moral superiority have lost credibility with this action. If they have a problem with what a foreign leader has to say then they should take to the floor with a rebuttal. Well, over half of Americans support this particular Ally. American people have jobs that are entirely independent on the support of this. Ally. Throwing a hissy fit and refusing to allow someone of that stature to speak before Congress is a very sad demonstration of weakness.

Holding people at the border and arresting peaceful protesters are also examples of stifling Free speech. Both can be true regardless of where you fall on the political spectrum. It's wild to me watching liberals turning into the scaredy cats that they claim. The conservatives are with actions like this. Hardly progressive.

Of course they are. Where do you find me saying otherwise?

? You think you get to independently choose your group? You don't, even among the most progressive.

You kinda sorta need to be welcome in the group whatever that group is.

That's the legal definition. It's insane that you're trying to argue that THAT is what's needed to consider the limiting of speech to be unacceptable. Your bias has clouded your ability to reason. I'm quite sure you're not making those claims about the campus protests being shut down by the schools.