SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT @ SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT @feddit.de

Posts

2

Comments

193

Joined

2 yr. ago

You can, but don't. You will always lose quality, you don't know if you will always be able to reliably download it in the future, you don't know when YouTube decides that private videos are unprofitable, and you don't know when YouTube will start applying some kind of content checks to your videos, decide they are in violation, and block/delete them.

Just pay for storage and upload encrypted copies or store an extra (encrypted) hard drive with a friend or so.

It's a relevant distinction.

Interference by unauthorized person's = outsider threat.

Other possibilities could be intentional malicious actions by authorized people (insider threat), or a mistake by authorized people (human error, incompetence, negligence, ...)

I'm glad that we can get news from such obviously neutral and unbiased sources. I'm sure a site calling itself "Electronic Intifada"would never try to distort the truth. /s

owner wouldn't even put the electric on for viewing because she didn't want to pay £1 a day standing charge

I bet the real reason is that turning on the power would reveal more trouble.

Does Vanced really use WebView for playback (the link the article provides suggests it's used for sign-in)?

Aside from forgetting to mention Revanced which is very much alive, I have doubts about the article. It feels like the author realized his headline doesn't work anymore so came up with something plausible sounding...

A bit late... Something new might replace it but this experiment got killed a couple days ago already.

Since you already received the genuine answers:

You need to be really careful. The expiration date isn't exact, but after that, they'll quickly ferment and turn into Surströmming on the inside.

In this case, I'd say the censorship worked in favor of Hamas, and while "poorly moderated" platforms did give them the opportunity to spread their "propaganda", Hamas used it to show everyone their true face. The result of the propaganda was people who were previously sympathetic to the Palestinian's cause we're now calling for Gaza to be turned into a parking lot.

I also find it rather rich that the article is complaining about misinformation when most of the press printed the lie about the hospital attack as if it was a fact.

In this case, I'd say the censorship worked in favor of Hamas, and while "poorly moderated" platforms did give them the opportunity to spread their "propaganda", Hamas used it to show everyone their true face. The result of the propaganda was people who were previously sympathetic to the Palestinian's cause we're now calling for Gaza to be turned into a parking lot.

I also find it rather rich that the article is complaining about misinformation when most of the press printed the lie about the hospital attack as if it was a fact.

Oh, I absolutely understand that a lot of tracking is stil possible. But in practice, it's usually handled by third parties via a script loaded from a third party domain, because doing any of the smarter stuff would require a) a competent IT team b) the marketing team talking to them constantly.

Much easier to just slap another tracker into Google Tag Manager.

Of course this doesn't help against tech companies. YouTube, Facebook, Reddit etc. will most likely track your views based on the requests, which you can't avoid. But this takes care of 90% of the tracking, and most importantly, it removes the "everyone tracking you across every site you visit" aspect of the ad surveillance industry.

uBlock Origin and Privacy Badger.

Can't fingerprint my machine if your fingerprinting script never loads.

There is an universally available subscription that applies to all services, costs $0/month, refuses donations, and is called uBlock Origin.

Haven't noticed any of the YouTube issues either so far.

The fact that the frontline hasn't significantly moved for over a year, aside from Kherson, should be obvious even from Russian propaganda. (Btw, this also shows that something major needs to happen if Ukraine is to get its territory back)

I think it's clear to everyone that that is not going to happen.

20% of their revenue comes from the EU, almost all of it from ads. I'd argue that complying with the law would cost them more than a quarter of the EU ads revenue, without affecting their costs much -> that'd be 5% of global revenue. Breaking the law still pays.

Also, how do you conclude that 448 million people paying 90 EUR per year, for a total of 40 billion EUR, wouldn't offset a 4.66 billion USD fine?

If the fine was 4% of global revenue every month, sure. So far it looks like it'd be every 3-5 years though...

Not too good to be true, but too good to be low risk.

15% ROI is definitely possible. Him screwing up and ending up bankrupt is also possible.

The red flag for me is "I know nothing about business" - you can't judge the risks. You should absolutely not invest money you can't afford to lose into risky stuff like this. In particular, taking out a loan just to loan the money to your friend would be a really stupid idea, and if he asked you to do that, he either is stupid, reckless, or doesn't care if you get hurt.

I'd only consider loaning my own money with which I can afford taking the risk, and only if he could plausibly explain what he's doing, and I felt like I can understand it and be confident that he can pull it off. I'd consider it a high risk investment on par with cryptocurrencies.

Given that you don't seem to fully understand and there are other red flags: stay away.

Just seeing the renaming bullshit they pulled off (really? renaming an existing project AND renaming a different thing to the old name?!?) is enough to avoid both projects. Anyone who creates confusion like that will also make other unsound decisions.

A monumental amount, or a tiny tax if the abuse doubles their profit...

Title made me think centimeters.

I don't understand how many business practices by airlines don't result in criminal charges. Selling so many tickets that you know you will occasionally fail to fulfill your contract should be fraud. Jail time for leadership and full reimbursement of all damages (e.g. private air taxi to still make to to the destination on time) would quicky make the airlines competent at finding voluntary agreements that make everyone happy.

Likewise, deciding that a flight isn't profitable and cancelling it - WTF. That's called making a bad business decision, you eat the cost. You don't just decide "eh, let's just not" and leave people stranded because it's cheaper.