SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT @ SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT @feddit.de

Posts

2

Comments

193

Joined

2 yr. ago

Same, except it's a sofa and I'd have the TV remote up my ass.

Enforcing DRM has a big downside: it paints a massive target on the DRM implementation, and it will likely end up getting broken.

I think there is a huge psychological difference between "spending on public good" and "here is some money", and especially where the latter happens, it should be very clear that the money is coming from the state/nation, not the individual leading it.

That may be obvious to you, so the message doesn't look like a problem, but I bet at least 1% of Americans think Trump personally gave them some of his personal cash out of generosity, effectively turning it into a bribe with public money. Which is exactly why Trump insisted that his name would be placed on the check. (The letter that came with it was surprisingly reasonable and clear, which is why I estimated 1% and not 5%).

I don't think the sound itself is freaky (i.e. I don't think it'd be perceived as freaky by people not familiar with it or similar messages at all).

It's the implication. At least I (as a non-American) associate the sound not with "generic public safety message" but firmly with "the president will now say goodbye to the nation and tell everyone to hug their loved ones one last time before the 3000 nukes/an asteroid/hostile aliens wipe out all life on Earth".

I think some movies also used the sound for submarine Emergency Action Messages (aka the thing that makes those 3000 nukes fly).

Honestly, it's kinda icky for a candidate to campaign for himself in conjunction with handing out public money, whether it's done by a Republican (Trump with the relief checks) or a Democrat.

Piped experience: page loaded, play button did nothing. After a large number of taps it finally played, for about 20 seconds, then reloaded mid-play.

Imagine, 100 people trying to load a video from your single hard drive, it’s not fast enough for that.

YouTube 1080p is 8-10 Mbit/s according to what I could find. That'd be 100-125 MByte/s for 100 people. I think my SSD is more than fast enough for that.

Even better, a 1 Gbps connection is also (just) enough to actually upload the video to those 100 people.

And with 100+ people watching, P2P distribution should work really well too.

Hopefully in a clean container though?

So, why was Boeing selling them until two of them crashed due to zero redundancy on a system capable of crashing the plane that was designed to add control inputs but was kept secret from pilots?

This one specific issue was addressed. Who knows which other compromises they had to make (and hide)...

Teleportation. Invisibility is a nice gimmick (until you accidentally leave it on and get hit by a car, that is).

Teleportation isn't just incredibly convenient, depending on the distances you can travel in one hop it'd also save you a lot of time (skip your commute, instantly travel to a nice vacation destination and back), and it'd be a money maker (fastest courier in the world).

Even if it was just line of sight, being able to easily reach places that are normally hard to reach or require extensive detours would be helpful. Even just crossing a busy street without having to wait for the traffic light would be a nice thing.

They might be able to relay them in a way that the end to end encryption is actually handled on the phone and the relay only relays encrypted messages.

That would likely still give them a capability to MitM but it's plausible that they couldn't passively intercept the messages.

They'll give them back just like the last time they asked you off your land...

You seem to be referring to something specific. Did Israelis kidnap children under the pretense of an evacuation, or are you "just" referring to the forced displacements that happened?

No, the network effect is too strong. Deleting WhatsApp is cutting off the primary/only way to contact many friends (in countries where it's the primary messenger), and a mild form of "abandon everything and go live in a monastery".

Why would that be a problem? We already often only use the last two digits to refer to the year, that'll probably not change.

Because if the statements by the IDF are true (there is little solid evidence but it'd be in line with what we know about Hamas' behavior), there is an obstacle in the way that isn't the IDF, too little fuel, or a technical problem.

"How are they going to limit consumption" really? Turn off breakers, pull plugs, turn off switches, have an electrician measure, whack everyone who uses power for anything but the absolutely most life critical applications with a large stick...

That sounds like a reasonable amount to provide, since they can provide another shipment 2h later if it actually goes to the hospital. (At full power it'd be 30 minutes, but I assume critical loads only could be powered a lot longer).

The evidence provided is weak though, and it could easily be staged. We didn't get lucky by having Hamas publicly confirm that they indeed did it, but it'd be inline with their other statements that show utter disregard for Palestinian life.

Especially since you can send another 300 liters, or even more, as soon as you see it actually going to the hospital.

Also, the hospital most certainly does not need 10000 liters a day for critical equipment. (To run everything like normal, maybe.)

uBlock Origin explicitly advises against this. If it's the only content blocker it doesn't currently have issues with YouTube, if you have multiple you'll probably hit the "disable your adblocker" warning.

The first three are using identical techniques so combining them is of very limited benefit. They're mostly there to cover software that doesn't have an ad blocker.

I'd stick with just ublock origin.