Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SC
Posts
0
Comments
4,658
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • to oblige the great body of the yeomantry, and of the other classes of citizens, to be under arms for the purposes of going through military exercises and evolutions,

    Weird you highlighted right after the states purpose.

    would be a real grievance to the people, and serious public inconvenience and loss.

    And stopped before the fun parts. Literally the rest of that sentence, lol.

    Also you left out the commitments by the same methodology.

    and in order to see that this be not neglected, it will be necessary to assemble them once or twice in the course of a year.

    When you do this, it seems like haven't read the Federalist Papers, just found parts in them that align with your view. I'm sure that's not true, but it's what it seems like.

    This paragraph just straight up does not mean what you're implying it means

  • it’s very ingrained in gun culture to be smart about what direction you fire.

    This is one of those things where 99% of people I see online say it, but like 10% of people I know in real life actually practice it.

    Like wearing protective gear on a motorcycle

  • This is arguing in favor of the national government having the ability to mobilize forces. At the time, there was no standing army

    Again, I mentioned it being relevant today. The US government neither wants nor needs your help

  • The ability to spread soft power diplomacy through infrastructure building and not just bombing brown people into oblivion

    The US is vastly better at this, and has been doing this for considerably longer, than China.

    One easy example : https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fcontributions-to-world-food-program-in-2022-by-country-v0-84ffrmt8e8za1.png%3Fs%3D127bffdefa8e2ef6727fd7116a5c1af6eb0eaacb

    How about something safe like food can have more spices than just black pepper.

    That's laughable given the two countries being discussed

  • I think a lot of us immediately think of the science fiction book and movie, “Minority Report” wherein law enforcement has access to the private thoughts of citizens and arrests and convicts those who have contemplated crime but have not yet perpetrated the crime.

    This is a matter of public policy, not tech. As are your privacy concerns.

  • What Foucalt gets wrong here is that historically, civilians just enjoy it. They don't find it barbaric or inhumane.

    Like there wouldn't be some national conversation about "what have we become" - it'll just be a fun thing people do.

  • I'm sure at some point in the future someone will do bad things with every piece of technology, as they have with every piece of technology so far.

    That's no reason to be upset about advances in new technology

  • I support Ukraine so very strongly here because the Russian-Ukrainian ex-girlfriend I have walked me through the history, takes from civilians on the Russian and Ukrainian side, and the reality that this war only exists to serve Putin, personally.

    Which of those takes are propaganda exactly?

  • I understand quite well how terrorist organizations work

    How do you think Hamas wins this war, or survives it with any degree of their operating infrastructure intact? If Hamas is non-viable going forward, Iran will just send the money elsewhere, meaning Hamas ceases to exist even if they survive.

    In what universe are dead martyrs better than living ones, assuming you're trying to galvanize people into supporting your organization?

    Perhaps you just meant "no sane human being joins a terror org so of course they won't surrender" in which case yeah that does describe the reality.