Having their genitalia out is too far. Butts and tits are not genitalia. What else is going too far is burning down a fucking Park.
Let me also ask you what you think about nude bike rides, where dozens, if not hundreds, of people cycle nude through a city. Is that too much for you?
Nope, that can easily be exempt as a form of artistic expression and doesn't fit into the type of actions I'm referring to. If you've seen the images it's very clearly artistic expression no different from the body paint artists that are also in Seattle.
Again I'm not fucking saying it's a common issue. Now you're just misunderstanding what I'm saying in bad faith. \
Again I'm merely asking how you feel about these specific individuals who go to far, and in this instance beyond the bounds of "kink" during public marches. \
But you keep fucking dodging the question with your irrelevant ass bullshit strawman argument, instead of actually answering my fucking question.
My point is that you seem to be worried about an imaginary issue that
I'm not worried about shit, I'm asking for your personal opinion on these very specific cases to push the discourse into careful consideration of how such cases effect the causes pushing for social change.
Just because it makes you uncomfortable or you don’t consider it LGBTQ doesn’t mean it needs to be changed.
Not even close to what I said, again this is not about people celebrating kinks or have their tits and ass out, I do not give a shit about such things.
I wouldn't classify the behavior of these specific individuals as "kink"... , I wouldn't even classify them as necessarily apart of LGBTQ+ either. I'm not saying it's common either, I'm mearly ask how you feel about them. I'm referring to the specific cases of individuals who take the opportunity to put on displays of public nudity & indecent exposure outside the bonds of the law. And I'm not referring to Will Walters; butt cheeks is not nudity.
And how do you feel about the marches or rather individuals in these marches that go to far? To be clear I'm not talking about the people who wear rubber suits.
They still very much do sell it though, even if it's "anonymized" as per their privacy policy. My sister has one of those fuckin watches, and for a week every single month, anyone connected to her WiFi gets bombarded with "feminine product" ads. This didn't happen until after she bought the stupid watch. \
While Apple claims to protect user privacy and not share personal data with third parties for their own marketing purposes, their policies also state that non-personal, de-identified information may be used for any purpose. \
Infact, the FTC has issued strong warnings about it and seem very pissed off about such practice. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has warned that anonymization is no shield for ad data collection, and that companies making such claims can be held accountable for deceptive practices. Unfortunately for us, that just means that Apple would likely face fines and penalties if found to be in violation of privacy regulations, meaning Apple doesn't give a shit as they and other massive corpos often do. \
Ultimately, users are warned to be cautious about the privacy claims made by tech companies like Apple, even those known for prioritizing privacy. I personally wouldn't even trust xiaomi, at least not without going over their privacy policies first and this goes for any companies selling such devices.
But do you like the idea of Apple farming your medical information? Apple sure loves that idea, that's why they made a watch that can track your steps and read your heart rate, and blood oxygen levels, as well as monitoring sleep patterns and menstrual cycles. \
Despite privacy claims; which are just marketing and hold no legal weight; Apple has a history of collecting various types of user data, including device usage, location, health data, and more, as outlined in their privacy policies; which does hold legal weight.
It's the type of words, I wouldn't have scribbled them out if it was just "fuck, shit, bitch, or even a slur(evident by my previous shitpost)", it's just that child ... and grape animals is a combo of words that's crossing a line into a vitriolic territory. Maybe if I could actually mark the comment itself as NSFW instead of relying on spoilers, but that's not currently possible. I just don't want to risk it.
Having their genitalia out is too far. Butts and tits are not genitalia. What else is going too far is burning down a fucking Park.
Nope, that can easily be exempt as a form of artistic expression and doesn't fit into the type of actions I'm referring to. If you've seen the images it's very clearly artistic expression no different from the body paint artists that are also in Seattle.