Rustmilian @ Rustmilian @lemmy.world

Dyslexic [Privacy](/c/privacy@lemmy.ml) & [Foss](/c/foss@lemmy.world) advoc

---

Read more

Posts

49

Comments

1,300

Joined

2 yr. ago

Why do you think trump started peddling Jesus bullshit last time he ran even though he's not even remotely cristian or religious. He'll shill anything as long as he thinks it'll profit him.

The fact people bought NFTs just proves that crypto bros just buy into hype without understanding the technology.
\ I knew NFTs were bullshit from the start because I actually took the time to understand how they "worked".

That goes for both....

Raphide

Fact : Pineapples have tiny needles that cause irritation.

Windows native games are shown....

"well duh, you were using one of those stupid AI boyfriend apps"

Now begins the enshittification of your insides.

It's gay slang used by gay people and femboys.
\ Also, nobody cares, you can stop virtue signaling now. When you single this hard even the LGBTQ+ are going to call you a clown.
\ Grow a sense of humor, this is literally a meme community dude, you're supposed to dunk on blatant propaganda, not some stupid satirical wordplay and some stupid story about being forced to become a gnome by a gnome dev.

The British when they see literally any cultural artifact.

An alarming amount of bodybuilder do steroids...
\ Including the Vegan ones...
\ The bodybuilder industry literally survives on steroids.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905478/#:~:text=The%20probability%20of%20lifetime%20use,anabolic%20steroids%20in%20their%20lifetime.

And it's not just anabolic steroids like shown in the ncbi study from iran, it's also androgenic steroids, growth hormones, testosterone boosters, and several different types of stimulants.

During boot up.

I mean... that is how I lose plague inc. almost every time.

Life is a wonderful, fantastical lottery that you've somehow managed to win, and I'm not going to let you throw it away.

And just like the lottery & taxes, the government ruins it.

Very convenient because if something happens where the update breaks something, you can just boot the previous image.

They're also very stable do to the image-based VCS.

Here, I'll make it more clear to you by defining what is not too far first.
\ In 2023 a bunch of nude cyclists were present during the public Seattle Pride Parade, while they were fully naked, half covered, etc. Their behavior is very clearly artistic expression and not inappropriate, as they were wearing body paint and commiting to other artistic representations of nudity no different from a body paint artist that are also very public in Seattle, nor were they engaging in inappropriate behavior or attempting to induce sexual arousal. In the same vein, wearing a rubber suit can also very much fall into the same category.
\ Does that make it more clear?
\ The specific cases are those intentionally engaging in behavior that can't be defined as artistic expression and can deeply harm the overall movement, such as the rare cases of inappropriate touching/unwanted touching.
\ Imo, strict codes of conduct such as those used by Nudist organizations during their public events in other more lax countries should be used, not only to discourage the behavior but to also protect the integrity of the events and movements when such cases do occur. The mentioned Seattle Pride Parade for example had no official code of conduct, luckily no such case occured during this particular event.

The fire was started by individuals from a LGBTQ+ pride/racial injustice protest. I attended this march myself as well, it was primarily a racial injustice protest but a lot of individuals were wearing & celebrating pride stuff as well. The end result was many deciding to continue the protest at rec park, where then it was burned to the ground by unknown individuals. My question is entirely centered around individuals that go to far during these types of events, be it indecent exposure/genital nudity, or what law enforcement consider crimes in general, that's what I've been trying to get across but certain people are seemingly misinterpreting my question on purpose and dodging the question so they can insert their own bullshit argument that has nothing to do with the question at hand & putting words in my mouth I never said. The fire example is mearly mechanism to try to drive home this primary point rather than conducive to the specific topic. The entire point of the question is to draw out your personal logical reasoning and nuance of how you perceive these specific individuals, to induce a level of reflection, to allow deepening of understanding of your stance and further push the discussion into a level of interpersonal discourse. As It's a complex issue that requires careful consideration on a deeper case-by-case analysis & is important to discuss how such cases effect the causes pushing for social change and how theses causes can deal with them respective of the law and the rights of others, while still finding ways to make their voices heard and push for progress.

Nudity at Pride is rare, can happen, but it's not exclusive to Pride. And also something that I think attitudes should change on. Nudity is not something that people should fear, nor should they be shamed if they are happy being nude.

Thank you for actually answering the question instead of strawman-ing like a certain someone else. I can agree to a degree. Is there a degree of nudity that you'd draw the line at? Are there cases of, say artistic expression that you'd say would get an exemption to that line?

P.s. I'm not the one who down voted your reply, I appreciate your reply as you are the only one who actually put thought into answering the question.