Risk @ Risk @feddit.uk

Posts

9

Comments

442

Joined

2 yr. ago

Source for those numbers?

Because both Hamas and Israel have reason to inflate the number of fighters.

y knot Firefox?

Indeed. It's a good little mobile game.

Eh, Poinpy is actually a lot of fun.

I would buy a pair of these, they look awesome.

Surely they intend to use it the same way the US does - projecting force to cement soft power?

I'm not sure I'd agree with that generalisation.

Is that why you personally worry about something?

Ah, I see. Thanks for clarifying.

TIL. But I'd like to know what exactly the damage was?

Now I'm wondering if all the problems I had with DS4s is related to Sony doing shady shit.

I still have a DS4 which will sometimes work via Bluetooth and sometimes not.

Probably more effective than any of the suggestions so far:

Make sure you are well hydrated and do some exercise or at the very least a long or high-energy walk.

But the end result is the platform influences voters leading to election of those or similar individuals.

That's not really true, unfortunately. People don't need to be in an elected position to be given a platform by media.

So, the societal problem is created when bad faith actors are given a platform, right? But bad faith actors tend to be great at generating outrage and division and thus drive engagement and clicks - which makes money for the platforms.

How do we solve this?

It's a meme ffs.

Depends whether you're parents/family have made the magic of Christmas or the presents the focus. My kids certainly would care; I did too.

The meme is about saving oxygen, not reducing CO² emissions.

I don't know whether it had a significant impact in Russia, but the rest of the world only knows/cares about the guy because he went back. Otherwise he'd just be yet another person murdered by Putin's regime.

Martyrdom. Navalny knew what it would mean to return; he also knew the risk of not returning (constantly trying to avoid shitty assassination attempts with collateral damage).

I found one source! It was sponsored by the British Tobacco Company, lol.

Nah, it's difficult to find recent data of it - because I get the impression from the papers I have found - the idea was thrown out as a marketing ploy in the 50s and has no significant impact on risk.

Instead it just makes cigarettes worse for the environment - because the filters don't decompose.

As far as I understand, this isn't quite right (unless it's changed recently).

If A defeds B, then A no longer sends new posts to B, accepts comments or posts from B users, or receives new posts from B. Any comments from B users on A's old posts (made before defederation) are no longer acknowledged by A.

I think A users can still interact with B's posts, but then I haven't seen any beehaw users in forever. So perhaps not?

C can obviously still interact with both A and B posts normally. On posts from C, both A and B users can still interact.

So, in short defederation creates a hard wall preventing interaction between A and B. The only way A and B users can interact is on C.

It's unfortunate as beehaw would have benefitted from a uni-directional defederation (i.e. preventing .world users from posting on beehaw, but not preventing .beehaw users from posting on .world. Unfortunately, it's both.)