Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)RA
Posts
0
Comments
45
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The majority of these self checkouts also rate limit you intentionally or otherwise (likely due to weight checking on the bagging area). I know I can scan a lot faster than they let me given a proper setup

  • I want to push back on this just a little. Clearly UM isn't the bastion of consistent good thought, but others that were maligned like return2ozma have been pretty consistent in what they post.

    This is to say, "Great, one person is a fuckup. Why are we attributing this to the whole group?"

  • It makes sense when you consider that it's an artistic choice and not one of necessity. He presumably likes the very overtly autotuned sound for one reason or another.

    If you only autotune a little bit, it's quite difficult to impossible to tell that it's been used by ear alone. In order to get his signature autotune sound, you need to make it shift the input by a significant amount, so to get the correct note on the output that means you need to sing intentionally high or low of the intended output by some amount (you can probably change the tone by varying how far off you sing from the intended output).

  • My preferred way around this is to spoiler the tag, since there's a few other tags of this sort floating around: /j (joking), /hj (half-joking), /srs (serious) for a few examples. Doing that still gives you a moment of not giving up the joke, but it's still ultimately there for anyone that wants or needs it

  • Hexbear is where the chapotraphouse users largely have landed assuming they followed the direct line of succession. There probably is some contingent in Lemmy.ml, but not because it was the successor

  • I would argue that this title implicitly suggests there's no genocide in Gaza while the other title doesn't reach beyond the bounds of Gaza.

    As to the "wiki is a bad source" I don't claim to have any knowledge of that poster's thoughts, but here's a couple possibilities I've come up with:

    They thought it was interesting that the genocide was evident to the "ordinary" person that edits wiki despite them thinking it's typically a bad source

    They are just some random ml user whose opinions on wikipedia don't strictly match that of the concensus of lemmygrad, hexbear, et. al. Since those instances are more united on that stance than I've observed Lemmy.ml to be (right or wrong as they may be, not making a judgment here)