This is the first time I heard of this and made me really curious. I tried my best to find any proof, confirmations or fact checking sites backing up this claim, but nada. Either the dude has succesfully paid literally everyone to lie, or, sometimes the truth sounds worse than a lie and our cognitive function really wants approvals for that.
If you have something solid, please send it to me, wish I could use this argument, but at this point I'd feel like yellow press
So, uhh.. what happens if a hacker gets access to critical functionality of said services, like wiping out computers? Can they theoretically really wipe out all of connected earth's windows computers? Seems like there should be some serious safeguards against this
I understand, but what I'm saying from my perspective is that I do not see that happening in any way possible, even if the beginning phase looks like startup nazi ideology. One can be cautious about new nuclear reactor in France exploding because one exploded in Chornobyl, while others, like me, will try to assure you it's quite impossible under new designs (new world order).
Like I said before, if Israel actually goes ahead and kills those millions Palestinians instead of displacing them, get back to me and I will write an apology letter for my ignorance and short-sightness, but as of things stand now, I simply don't see how is it possible for Israel to do this without causing their own destruction.
You said: “Nazis wanted to kill them all, not move them further away.” I pointed out that’s historically inaccurate
Historically inaccurate in early years when barely anyone paid attention to nazi germany.
Historically accurate in relevant years.
You keep insisting I’m making “extreme” comparisons. But all I’ve done is point to a well-documented historical pattern: the Nazis didn’t begin with gas chambers. They started with deportation plans, ghettos, and forced removals. That’s not hyperbole: it’s basic historiography.
But do you not see how this argument is flawed? Evolution is not a one way street. It takes different routes. Just because something starts with x does not 100% mean it will always end with y, especially in vastly different timeline where I highly doubt this can happen with masses in a country that got all eyes on them. They'd be done and they know it.
Your historical documentations about what happened in country X is NOT a prophecy about country Y. Politics is not a mathematics that follows a formula.
Also, please stop using ChatGPT to refine your answers.
Look buddy who knows it all, when Israel actually decides to kill those million Palestinians instead of moving them, get back to me abd I'll apologize for my ignorant statements, but as of things stand now, I cannot take you seriously when you push for extreme comparisons while nit-picking how it all started.
Your argument somewhat reminded me of the "weed is a getaway drug to stronger drugs" argument. No, that's not always the case.
It's kinda dissapointing that the world is going from "we should care about our data or privacy" to "why/what's the point".
Giving up on this also means privacy focused software is going to become more and more "not worth the effort" for devs.
Huge win for everyone who wants to manipulate you