Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)QU
Posts
1
Comments
387
Joined
1 mo. ago

  • Neoliberalism is absolutely not the default when we look at the whole world. If we look at the developed world it is the default. That is not the case for everyone.

    Your binary only makes sense for some of the world. That’s why I keep pointing to how eurocentric it us.

  • “ Chinese workers do control the means of production through public ownership being the principle aspect of the economy, the large firms and key industries are firmly in the public sector. “

    No, they do not. Try looking at what is listed on the exchanges sometime. It might surprise you. It’s false to claim workers control the means of production when an investor class and investment banks exist.

    Im not presuming to know socialist “theory” better than those that choose to accept it but there are actual realities that most leftists actively avoid because it makes their claims invalid. In this case an investor class having been created since the revolution is a sign of failure.

    Finally you made a claim of all which ypu then made exceptions to that made the claim of “all” factually incorrect. You want to debate theory when I keep pointing out that “all of them but not really all of them” loterally means not all of them. As your claim that I reject outright relies on “all” your claim is not correct. Everyone who is “explaining” things is over looking that you said “not all” means “all”

    Sorry that your logic is not as solid or valid as you thought in this case.

    Again please remember your beliefs are not facts and much of what marxists claim has not been proven.

  • Im not arguing whether it us acceptable for the state to restrain private industry, but if you are claiming that Iran is liberal they cannot do this to the extent they currently are doing. My point is Iran is not a liberal nation

  • Go look at that first sentence you keep quoting. It says ALL without any exceptions.

    The truth is the “theory” they profess is unproven and you accept it all as fact and I do not based on the lack of evidence to support the claim.

  • Of they aren’t making the change to permit liberalism then it does matter and currently my understanding is the state is dragging theor feet on privatization.

    Chinese workers do not control the means of production and there is a growing wealth inequality. The PRC is simply lying about their pursuits of socialism.

    You probably shouldn’t be talking about any nation given you have trouble grasping hiw “All but not really all” means not all.

  • All means 100%. The fact that an exception is made where it does not happens means it is not “all”.

    Of course all of this presumes the rest is true and that has never been adequately demonstrated to be the case. Marxist assertions are called “theory” by leftists but they do not have that level of credibility or validity IRL. It is always worth remembering “theory” is really from from the case

  • And you are presuming the discussions being had are about capitalism when they are still debating the role of the government in private ownership.

    It’s a eurocentric position. It’s odd how many “leftists” fall into this.

  • Note you can only complain about what I was doing to improve things. Is this because you did nothing and are just looking to attack those that are trying to make things better for others or is it because you dont think I should protest ICE or feed hungry people?

  • No but being slow because you refuse to adopt the liberalizing policies is an indication that you aren’t serious about being liberal. It’s like suggesting China is serious about socialism when they have a stock market and income inequality is widening.

  • You presented a numbers based claim that this happens most of the time. You then made an exception that alters the entire definition of your claim from “most” to “some” which invalidates your claim.

    You are fundamentally misunderstanding the flaw in your argument because you haven’t looked at your initial claim.