Hasn't Fetterman been getting tons of criticism for being exactly that, being to the right of most leftists/liberals? Do you think that's overblown and he's still mostly on the side of the left?
I hope you can tell how clueless many of us feel having read your initial comments. You're not doing a great job of communicating what you think and why. Granted, you don't have to, and it's a bit annoying how much patience is required, but if you don't others will likely not care to ask you to explain. Anyway, just a thought as I've been realizing I need to get better at communicating - I'm probably overdoing it now ;)
I won't debate your take on phone interviews being representative of any American under 80; I think it's ridiculous
About your anecdote, you're saying you think some people earn double or triple at the same job? Surely not, right? So what about the people that still work at those jobs? How do you think life is going for them?
In the telephone survey of 1,818 adults Aug. 10-14, 71% of Americans described the economy as either not so good or poor. And 51% said it's getting worse.
But 60% said their financial situation is good or excellent.
Come the fuck on dude. How can you possibly believe that? And who's upvoting all your comments?
Everything you say now is suspect if you can believe that data is representative of most Americans. Not only that, you're parroting the info everywhere like you're confident in the data and knowledgeable on the subject, and yet it's based on fucking phone interviews. What single, working mom do you think answers a random phone number and then is also willing to take an interview about the economy?
Sorry, if this feels legit impossible to believe. I live in SoCal and literally everyone I know is struggling or has commented about how much more expensive rent is and how impossible it seems to get by compared to just a few years ago. Lots of people have to live with their parents/families now even though they work full time.
What do you or "economists" call it when no one (exaggerating here in case it's not obvious) in a city/state can afford rent to live on their own like they used to be able to? Put another way, what do you call it when six figures used to mean stability and now it means paycheck to paycheck for many families?
You're seriously saying people are just confused about their finances? What about all the articles about people not buying new cars and not buying this or that anymore? Why do economists think that is? That's just a coincidence?
Thanks for the response. I appreciate it. I don't necessarily agree with your POV, obviously, but I do sincerely appreciate the explanation.
That said, if you think that was neutral, you need a bit of work on your communication skills. Most people would just tell someone speaking to them like that to fuck off. I began writing a reply but I don't really think it makes sense to continue the dialogue. I doubt you really care what I think anyway, and that's totally fine. We can agree to disagree.
Vasquez was endorsed by several police groups. He won Tuesday’s nonpartisan primary election after returns showed him receiving more than 50% of the vote.
It's like 2016 all over again. It's fascinating how we learned absolutely nothing.
We're fucked and there's nothing we can do about it
I'll vote for Biden, and do it proudly, but I'd never be so pathetic as to resort to whatever the fuck these grandstanding libs/Dems/definitely not progressives are doing when they try to "convince" people to support the candidate they support (read: try to feel morally superior for their vote) as they look down their noses at anyone that dares to ask, "Hey, did Clinton oppose gay marriage? Did she do enough to oppose the Iraq War when she was Secretary of State? Is it true she's said some super racist shit in the past?"
Isn't that just showing an increase in income that's like a tiny percentage? Didn't that "raise" come during a period when inflation increased significantly and cancelled it all out?
Honestly, it's super annoying that you replied all defensive as if anyone was attacking Biden. It's hard to take anything you say seriously now. I'm voting for the piece of shit but it seems insane to pretend he's actually trying to help poor Americans at the expense of corporations and their shareholders.
There's an ongoing class war and there's bipartisan support for the rich in all three branches of gov.
Mad disrespect to you as well, though I appreciate the response
That said, I think it's relevant since he supports the political party that heavily pushes white supremacist ideology and is heavily supported by white supremacists. No, I don't think I'm being racist (based on either the academic or layman definition) by making light of the coincidence of his surname and his support for a party that advocates for white supremacy.
Now you answer just one question for me: Do you think the average Black man living in the US in say 1845 (pre-Civil War) or 1930 (just after the KKK reached its peak membership of ~5 million) was racist due to their likely negative views of the average White American, the policies they supported and the prevalence of White domestic terrorists that were not investigated/charged/convicted?
Answer honestly. Let's chat about it; I'm super curious to read your answer
I honestly care about high income inequality and campaign finance reform. Can we talk about those instead of what you care about?
No, this is actually a really effective way of communicating with other people and convincing them what I have to say is worth listening to. This absolutely does not alienate people or make me come off as an insensitive bot that doesn't know hot treat people like humans before I unload my personal interests on them
Thanks for sharing your POV. It's definitely the first time I've heard something that radical about dogs, which are basically the most beloved living thing in the US, but I can somewhat understand where you're coming from.
I'd definitely support making it more difficult to own a dog, but mostly because many of the dog owners I've met are borderline abusive to their pets (I'm mainly thinking of neglect here). I don't think I could ever support a ban on entire breeds. That's where it starts to seem crazy to me. Make it a felony to own a dog that bites someone or something but don't make it a felony to simply own the dog. We don't even have such laws for people that own guns or swords and surely those lead to more deaths/injuries than dogs.
Idk why you think I'm upset. I'm more shocked than anything.
I would think most people tend to support conservation of different animals and whatnot, except for maybe mosquitoes (and even then I'd be hesitant). It's also blowing my mind that you're heavily upvoted. I had no idea some of y'all thought this way.
That said, I'm just going to assume I don't fully understand what you're saying since it seems so batshit crazy to me. It's clear this isn't really an honest, open dialogue anyway, and that's totally fine
Yeah, I've actually been looking into trying Linux as my entire personality as well