PresidentCamacho @ PresidentCamacho @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

293

Joined

2 yr. ago

Idk who your arguing with, I was showing a different point of view on why someone might vote third party, not sure why you're responding like such a dick.

It sounds like your interpretation of the spoiler effect centers on people voting third party due to dissatisfaction with the 2 unfortunately omnipresent parties, which would be the same as not voting. Have you considered that some people who were going to vote no matter what might vote for a third party candidate because their listed policies actually resonate with them?

We don't just give them free reign, for the most part the world promotes being selfish.

Damn near everything we ever hear takes no one else into account. Living wage is less and less common, billionaires have all the money in the world and zero accountability, healthcare (Mostly US specific) is an overpriced scam with no guardrails, food costs whatever the fuck the people who control it tell us it costs regardless of production costs, housing costs way too fucking much, fake news is more and more prevalent and conning more and more fools.

Its easy to see why people focus on no one but themselves anymore, its just the way of the world, toxicity is winning.

Hey good for you, unlike everyone else in this thread making up reasons why the tech is bad, you are mature enough to recognize the fear is from ignorance. I am in the same boat. I'm currently using a manager with MFA on everything which works well for me. Might look into this tech once it's baked longer. I don't like the idea of early adoption to a tech when it's security related.

Boomers are still alive, so literally all of the rules ever as fast as possible.

Special standout for "dont believe everything you read" - "Well fuck you Ill believe everything without thought"

So thats on me, I said "does nothing to change our two party system" when I should have said "does nothing to remove our two party system". All this does is concentrate power into the democrats which if they had no worry of winning elections would very quickly openly turn into the Billionaire Boot Licking Society overnight. We need more political parties.

All this being said I'm not arguing against removing the electoral college, it needs to die. But Americas problems run so much deeper than the GOP

And none of this happens until we ditch the two party system. Because the Dems will just continue to do the bare minimum to win elections while still serving the billionaire class.

Removing the electoral college does nothing to change our two party system so I don't understand why you think it solves billionaire class rule.

You're most likely right, they recognize the headline saying "DOJ considering breaking up Alphabet" would be meaningless to most people.

Yeah especially when you consider that this "conservative democrat president" is the one who put Lina Khan at the head of the FTC and Merrick Garland at the head of the DOJ, and is why for one of the few times In my life I'm seeing news articles about people in the government doing their fucking job of protecting the American people from American Corporations.

A great question, Id never considered that previously.

My instant gut feeling would be that they would all just continue selling adds, but as separate entities?

Also how does breaking up google work when the current structure is that Alphabet is the primary company now?

Hmmmm, lead water from my bidet, or asbestos toilet paper, which will poison my poor asshole quicker I wonder?

Yes obviously. But it still irritates me as someone who does geometry for a living.

That's just what I said but more into the weeds on the detail.

The only assumption needed to solve the problem is that the bottom line is indeed straight. Generally it will never be assumed in these types of learning practices that a straight line is a lie, because at that point you can never do a single problem ever. However an undefined angle can be cheesed.

Though it still bugs me on a fundamental level they will cheese the angle to bait a person into a wrong answer, it can teach a valuable lesson about verifying information.

We can solve this issue of a straight line being guaranteed by doing this. This actually is probably a really good practice considering the exacting nature of certain disabilities such as ADHD and Autism. However if you live in the US you need to just accept things like this because we will NEVER fund public education properly let alone consider accessibility beyond things mandated by the ADA

Random guy who didn't sleep in middle school here: I also got the same answer.

It pisses me off to no end that what is CLEARLY shown as a 90degree angle is not in fact 90deg, I hate it when they do that.

Also I will sadly admit this can teach people lessons about verifying the information themselves.

^{GrumbleGrumbleGrumble....}

Hey that's some good job security, learn the niche thing and become irreplaceable.

Oh I see, its only for a static page. This makes so much more sense.

I can see why you mentioned this feature fits weird with react, and I have to agree, its contradictory to the entire purpose of React lol.

So you're offloading the JS processing onto the server? I cant be understanding this correctly because there is no way anyone wants to pay for the serverside cost of something that used to be an end user "cost". Also this would add interaction latency.