Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)NO
Posts
1
Comments
186
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • This guy has been so cringe for the last 5 years it's so hard to look at. Fractally cringe. Every single thing he does is cringe, his little adventures are cringe and his whole journey is cringe af. Cringe King.

    He is so freaking boring!

  • My point is people aren't expecting AGI. People have already tried them and understand what the general capabilities are. Businesses today even more. I don't think exaggerating the capabilities is such an overarching issue, that anyone could call the whole thing a scam.

  • Those are two different things.

    1. they are craming ai everywhere because nobody wants to miss the boat and because it plays well in the stock market.
    2. the people claiming it's awesome and that they are doing I don't know what with it, replacing people are mostly influencers and a few deluded people.

    Ai can help people in many different roles today, so it makes sense to use it. Even in roles that is not particularly useful, it makes sense to prepare for when it is.

  • I think in many cases people intentionally or unintentionally disregard the time component here. Ai is in development. I think what is being marketed here, just like in the stock market, is a piece of the future. I don't expect the models I use to be perfect and not make mistakes, so I use them accordingly. They are useful for what I use them for and I wouldn't use them for chess. I don't expect that laundry detergent to be just as perfect in the commercial either.

  • I don't think ai is being marketed as awesome at everything. It's got obvious flaws. Right now its not good for stuff like chess, probably not even tic tac toe. It's a language model, its hard for it to calculate the playing field. But ai is in development, it might not need much to start playing chess.

  • I don't care for comparisons, but the comparison to 9/11 is not really accurate.

    This is a war between neighbouring countries, one of which calls itself a super power, yet has not only completely failed to achieve it's goals, it has depleted itself doing it. It has practically destroyed all it's weapons, which were before the war thought of as limitless, it has reduced it's gas pump economy to ashes, it has destroyed it's status and already lost it's sphere of influence in Syria and elsewhere and ... wings wheel above in silent loops.... If you know what I mean.

    NATO is of course needed beyond Russia, stupid question. Plus Russia still has nukes, which would be safer if Russian state somehow survives this war.

    What I'm saying is no propaganda, just a very very sober assessment of the current situation.

    Russia has lost immediately when it was clear, that it cannot take Ukraine. It's perceived status as a super power went down the drain and nobody is taking it seriously anymore. It cannot project power, it cannot hold a sphere of influence.

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Is there an idiots guide to self hosting?