Oh I have no doubt about that - maybe there's a story behind their strictness. Maybe the companies I've worked for have not yet had an employee publicly embarrass the company to such an extent, that they felt the need to make this a mandatory part of employee onboarding.
That sounds unethical, to say the least. Did they verify if you actually did it, or just “suggest” you do?
There was no top-down verification, but I worked with a few Grade A suck-ups, who would proudly volunteer information on which accounts they used and which posts were theirs. I kept politely ignoring the repeated verbal requests until management moved on to their next big obsession.
Corporations drill it deep into your head that _you do not positively promote your own products or negatively review competitor products
This isn't a general or global thing. I have yet to be told above in any place I've worked, and one place even asked people to write fake reviews on Trustpilot/job sites
My wife insists on true neutral and I can't think of a worse way of doing it. I try to counterbalance with lawful good whenever I have eggs, bit I'm always playing catch up...
Yeah I guess I was thinking about cost when I said effort. I figured maybe building up would also provide more design challenges to keep the thing from collapsing, or is that negligible?
Very interesting! I never thought of that before. On the building pictured, which would take least effort to double the storage space - making it twice as long, wide or tall?
I can imagine that happening. A substantial share of marriages end in divorce, where only 2 adult individuals need to agree on how things should be run. I can't imagine adding additional people would make things less likely to fall apart
You mean feddit.de, or did .org also get abandoned?