Pietson @ Pietson @kbin.social

Posts

1

Comments

117

Joined

2 yr. ago

English is a second language to me, and at this point it's probably the only commonly used word I consistently mess up. It usually ends up something like 'nessecairy'

So you're saying the Aussies found a way to tax the rich while simultaneously shortening their lifespan?

You should report them either way.

More likely he wanted to retire but still enjoyed meeting fans

Nothing is stopping you from casting it multiple times

in belgium it's probably the most popular messaging app.

it's also free for anyone that played in early access.

it's what plants crave!

In Belgium we mostly use Jan met de pet ("Jan with the cap")

windscreen mount or android auto/carplay?

currently I'm in a campaign that plays without a regular schedule, joining a new campaign in late august, and my current DM has asked if I'd be interested in doing one more (although i think he means once the current one is wrapped up). on top of that I've been talking with some colleagues about doing one, and I'll be running an introductory one shot sometime next month too. might need to trim it a little..

If health insurance gets access to our DNA they could even know if there's a history of illness in your family, or how prone you are to drug/alcohol/cigarette addiction, and use that info to increase your rates. It's just one of the reasons why volunteering that data away freely to companies like 23andme is a terrible idea.

If the answer is yes, then it simply will never take over. As long as we have some sort of law that requires art to be tagged as AI if it’s AI generated, then I think that would be enough. No need to tag original (human) art with anything, no need for that kind of surveillance, just tag AI art or make companies legally required to divulge if it is so.

I find it hard to imagine that such a law would ever be implemented, even harder to imagine it would be enforced well, and even if both of those happen, that companies wouldn't find ways around it like just oversaturating everything with "may contain AI generated imagery" so that the tag becomes entirely meaningless.

adding a mandatory label doesn't really feel like a good solution to me.

Same, don't really see the point of filling my sub feed with something I dislike.

I've made a shortcut in Firefox to add the kbin mobile site to my home screen and it is essentially indistinguishable from a mobile app like this.

Also if it is real, surely they can just prove it by sharing where the picture is taken?

Edit: apparently it was taken at a Gucci exhibition. Surely that's enough info to double check?

If the kid can't enter into the contract surely the phone wouldn't belong to them though?

if you read the article it's just some joke tweets that bbc decided to make up a misleading title about.