Pheonixdown @ Pheonixdown @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

239

Joined

2 yr. ago

How do you propose doing research other than through informed consent from willing volunteers? Let alone that this whole chain of events even stemmed from a research paper! How are they supposed to do the research you said they need to do, when they're actively punished for doing it?

Dvorak?

Have you considered switching to pickup when you can? pick what you want from the comfort of your home, drive to the store at the designated time, an employee has picked all your goods and it is brought out to you. Same price for you, more labor for the company to pay for.

RoboQuest has been my main jam for a bit, decent little roguelite shooter. I like how you unlock travel to different areas by finding things from other paths.

Wish it scaled to more than 2 player though...

There are more keys available for other functions in the keyboard as well. ESDF and for some RDFG are even better than WASD for a similar reason.

You're headed towards the Star Trek episode "A Taste of Armageddon". I'd also note, that people losing a war without suffering recognizable losses are less likely to surrender to the victor.

I feel like it's ok to skip to optimizing the autonomous drone-killing drone.

You'll want those either way.

I just checked an Amazon purchase that had the option for a payment plan, my options were to use my Chase card affiliated with Amazon or Affirm which is a 3rd party that is offering the structured payment. Not sure what it looks like for others, but if it's similar, then Amazon wouldn't be doing anything bank-like with those payments.

You could do banner ads, shrink the video, randomly add a banner to top/bottom and a 2nd left/right. If you skip the ads, you skip the content too.

I've been watching and enjoying Jesse Cox (on his CoxClips youtube) play it. He knows a lot about the universe lore and does some explaining for people who may not be as familiar. Someone related to the game also mailed him some ARG stuff related to the game before it came out and he did a few videos on his jessecox channel for it.

I'm expecting someone smart at Google to figure out how to encode ads as part of the video file as it is delivered, making it literally undifferentiatable in the data we receive, and then there's no way around it. They'll make millions in ads and billions licensing it out.

There is no neutral role, everything can be made partisan.

If the people don't like the actions of an elected official, they can either try to vote them out in the next election or try to force a recall and replace them.

Your talk of providing estimates just reminds me of this scene from Star Trek TNG.

Geordi La Forge: I told the Captain I'd have this analysis done in an hour.

Scotty: How long will it really take?

Geordi La Forge: An hour!

Scotty: Oh, you didn't tell him how long it would 'really' take, did ya?

Geordi La Forge: Well, of course I did.

Scotty: Oh, laddie. You've got a lot to learn if you want people to think of you as a miracle worker.

I'm a fan of Bucklin voting in particular, allowing equal and skipped rankings along a bounded range of 0 to twice the number of candidates, every candidate default of 0. Give people an offline digital interface to do the work, they confirm it, print it, check it and it gets scanned to be counted. Undecided if I think votes should be weighted by rank or not, maybe just for tiebreaker.

"Earn my vote" is the bullshit mentality that led to Trump being president. Fuck all of that. R's are batshit, and if someone doesn't commit a vote that can matter against them, that person's part of the problem when R's win.

There is literally NO issue where someone who would normally vote for Biden has a better option under any realistic R candidate.

In the 2024 presidential race, if anyone who would otherwise vote for Biden, from any state that is not 100% safe, chooses not to over basically any issue(s), they improve the odds of an R, with a worse stance on that issue, winning the election. Ideology can take a long walk off a short pier when sobering reality comes knocking.

Abstention and 3rd party choices are indirect support for the candidate you'd least prefer.

Both choices might be a shit sandwich, but the US system just doesn't support not eating one, so it might as well be the one you'd rather than the alternative.

Chex Quest was straight gasoline.

Everyone has a bias and that's expected and the stating of opinions as opinions is good, the line is stating opinion as fact or review bombing.

I didn't play it because I didn't want to log in, isn't a review of the actual game, it's at best review bombing against secondary logins. It tells anyone interested in playing the game nothing other than that a secondary login is needed.

The definition of the minimum criteria for what makes a game is pretty nebulous, but survivor styles are well above all but the most disingenuous definitions of what makes a game. Saying it isn't a game because you don't enjoy it is not having a bias that causes you to like something less.

The trending of most games to be 7+/10 is largely driven by idiots who tied the success of a game to metacritic scores and publishers who retaliate against games journalists for "hurting" that success by not cooperating with them on future products by providing review codes.

"I don't like X game/genre" is a fine take, calling something you don't like “not really a game" is not, unless you can really justify it not meeting some minimum criteria to be called a game (doesn't present a challenge or problem to overcome, doesn't have a fail-state, has no player agency, etc)