Skip Navigation

User banner
Pandantic [they/them]
Pandantic [they/them] @ Pandantic @midwest.social
Posts
14
Comments
841
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • brain washing half the country with your sick violent rhetoric.”

    Greene in 2021 appeared in a campaign video holding a 50-caliber rifle and promising to “blow away the Democrats’ socialist agenda.” She then fired the rifle at a Toyota Prius with a “socialism” sign on its side. Footage showed the vehicle exploding with the words, “Target destroyed” displayed on screen. The video promoted a giveaway of the rifle “for Americans only.”

    When was the last time a Democrat appeared in a political ad with a firearm? More of the right’s projection and gaslighting.

    I don’t see political ads - do the ones Biden’s running say things like “Trump must be stopped at all costs?” I just worry that the dems will take the bait and turn down their messaging while the right keep the flames burning.

  • Emerson T. Brooking @etbrooking ~20 hours after a seismic event in American history (with a lot of very bad discourse), this is the first real attempt at AI disinformation that I’ve seen.

    Wake-up call for anyone worried that it was deepfakes that were going to radically alter 2024.

    Quote

    Mike Rothschild (no relation) @rothschildmd · 10h There's a fake version of the Trump photo getting passed around by resistance accounts that claims to show Secret Service agents smiling as they grab Trump. The real photo clearly doesn't show them smiling.

  • Was it a camera phone video from the crowd? I saw where one guy said they tried to warn the SS because they saw the shooter.

  • It was some fast thinking and good political instinct (although bad survival instinct) to make a photo perfect pose while getting escorted out by secret service.

    I’ve heard reporting say that he was informed that the shooter was already taken out by the time he fist-pumped.

  • Reports are coming in that he was a registered republican, but had donated to dems once in the past. He was only 20 so not a lot of political history to go on.

  • I think this poster is saying: “since you believe two wrongs don’t make a right, then when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, the correct thing to do in your view would to turn the other cheek.”

  • Equality begins at birth. Education, healthcare, welfare, etc. should all be free and available to everyone. This is how you beat discrimination.

    You should have probably lead with that. You got downvoted because you sounded like another right-wing dei basher imo.

  • Like the kid in the story, who literally got made fun of by the teacher, was like “I think he need to write an apology to the whole school, but he shouldn’t get fired.” He’s a good person. And the dad said he thought the teacher should go through racial sensitivity training but not lose his job. Idk if I agree with them, but at least they are thinking with compassion and not rage.

  • You should see the “sleeping in class” one. He pseudo-curses in it and talks about how rude it is before going on with the question.

  • Obama said the same once, exploring the "what if" of if he was elected more than twice.

    From what I can tell, Obama said he probably could have beaten Trump if he had run for a third term AFTER the 2016 election was over. Unless you are referring to something different.

    (1) neither stand by what some of their more extreme supporters have done, (2) hence some of the people in Trump's list of allies, who do not fit the racial image promoted by said followers.

    On the first point, do I really need to quote the things Trump has said about the January 6th protesters? And those who participated in the Charlottesville white nationalist march in 2017?

    On the second point, regardless of many of his supporters being racists, Trump knows he has to still win over black and Hispanic voters in the political game. And why would he reject a lap dog like Ben Carson or Justice Thomas regardless of their skin color?

    Your last sentence was too long and I don’t understand what you were trying to say, except: 1. Biden and possibly Harris are the only one on the “Trump wants the send to jail list” that make sense to you, and 2. Not every crime will be immune under the new SCOTUS ruling.

    1. Me too, but I know why Trump added them: they are detractors from his “big lie” scheme and/or have criticized him publicly. 2. I understand that in theory, but with a corrupt judicial system, rules can be bent. There are plenty of articles out there outlining how, within currently legal means, the president (whoever they are) can be immune to doing harm to anyone. That, combined with the other reasons I’ve stated, and a myriad of others (Hitler talking points, for example), is the basis for my stance that Trump reaches super villain status.
  • That's not "his" evil plan

    Fair, but as the puppet in this theater of government takeover, he is culpable.

    which doesn't even include the president for life part, that was wishful thinking out loud

    Clearly, him wishing to be a dictator does not concern you…

    the part about jailing opponents is mainly related to those who exploited due process in the political sphere in the past eight years

    Can you outline these for me, with some references? The list is:

    • Joe Biden
    • Kamala Harris
    • Mitch McConnell
    • Chuck Schumer
    • Mike Pence
    • Liz Cheney

    are we really going to hold someone accountable just because of their toxic fandom?

    Absolutely, when he stands by them.

  • I would say, most of the time, if the game-have is not a jerk, they will be fine with you saying, “Can you slow down?” or asking a question. But like the main comment on this thread said, maybe I just have great game-having friends and acquaintances.

    Coincidentally, I saw a similar comment where the the new player was the antagonist, saying things like, “That’s too complicated!” to a simple rule. I tried to find it, but I had no luck.

  • What has Trump actually done that screams "I am an outright villain for this nation, fear me"?

    Do you mean besides the evil plan (project 2025), his explicit statements of becoming “president for life”/overstepping the bounds of the 2-term presidency, talking about jailing his opponents (including some republicans), his associates calling for violence, his lawyers referencing immunity to political violence (military assasination of a political rival), and an actual insurrection by his followers?