PandaBearGreen [they/them] @ PandaBearGreen @hexbear.net

Posts

0

Comments

48

Joined

2 yr. ago

A sovereign nation who's leadership drank the NATO kool-aid against the protest of their nuclear armed neighbor, goading them into a fight. The victims are the people of both nations.

I actually have a position.

No one is justifying the acts of Russia. They should not have invaded! But to act like there is no pretext to conflict and Ukraine is completely innocent is disingenuous. Peace is the better option.

It's like you have an opinion and don't all at the same time. Maybe reconsider your position.

Russia has definitely not engaged in total war.

1989 Revolutions? Wholesale dismemberment of the USSR more like. And treaty didn't say it. The Russians sure as fuck did.

The contradiction is saying that allowing a country to defend/enforce its borders is appeasement. The implications is that to do so is aggression.

Seem contradictory to use charged language like 'appeasement '. And then to say you want everyone to coexist peacefully. It seems to advocate for containment which isn't peaceful coexistence.

Says person calling people assholes.

You said appeasement.

burners are going to burn

Aaaah, but they started it...

Now we're just throwing genocide into the mix?

You are coming off as very not nice.

Nice false equivalent. Keep trying.

Yall calling for the continuation of the war are telling on yourselves. Otherwise you'd fucking be fighting rather than advocating behind a computer for others to die. Too scared to go to Spain and fight the fascists?

imagine not thinking war is bad. imagine believing American propaganda given its track record.