Ookami38 @ Ookami38 @sh.itjust.works

Posts

3

Comments

1,209

Joined

2 yr. ago

If he's stable that explains the horse shit...

Killing in the Name is the right answer, I feel.

.... . -.?

I had already read that book prior to my teacher reading it aloud in class. She couldn't read that chapter, so I volunteered to, having already had my trauma from the scene. We didn't end up watching the movie, though.

I never got plastering logos for whatever brands you love to consume on everything you own. Like buying decals and stickers and shit to put all over your car, laptop, whatever else. Since when do we pay to advertise for brands..?

Another good video discussing the origins of Yahweh/YHWH

Okay that sounds a lot less insane than the mental picture I had. I was like, "mines? Some weird construction..? Snow piercer?" But it sounds like just regular level younger people doing obsessive things to the point of resembling self-harm.

That's your only contribution? Cool. Objections duly noted.

Proofreading your own work without a significant time gap is pretty useless. You'll catch a few obvious errors, but approaching the same problem in the same mental space tends to lead to the same thought patterns, tends to lead to making or overlooking the same mistakes.

You'll do a bit better reapproaching the subject a few days later. It's almost, but not quite, like reading a new piece of writing. In my experience, comments are set and forget, unless you're obsessive like me and enjoy rereading your old shit.

By far the most effective proofreading, though, is an Editor. There's a reason it's a paid position for anyone who makes a living writing. A completely different person will read the text more as-is, without accidentally interpreting it how they INTENDED it to be written. This will catch far more errors, but isn't really practical for shit posting in social media. The closest you'll get is someone calling out a typo or grammatical error.

As long as the intent of the message is clear, it passes the bar for acceptable social media content. We're not writing PhD theses, we're just having fun discussions. We're not writing a paper meant to be readable to someone independently, we're engaging in dialogue and can easily ask the other person to clarify.

TL;DR high-level proofreading and error correcting isn't really as viable on social media as it is formal writing, nor is it really necessary as long as the message received is the message intended.

If you don't mind me asking, what was the environment? That sounds miserable.

As a dude with weird AF sitting positions (seriously, this is vanilla compared to the curl of limbs I can become), I've never once crushed my junk from sitting. I don't know how people have trouble with them.

I'd love a single giant lady to finger...

What were we talking about again?

The only hope is that they keep rereleasing so much they end up back at Morrowind. Except they'll probably ruin it.

Get my resume together

Y'all bots?

Mate, they made a joke. Kinda like the ones the celebrated George Carlin made.

Where people walk, but also sight lines. Particularly in bedrooms.

Great. Another old white man. Welcome to the owmer class, I suppose.

That'd be all the things.