I haven't heard anyone question if it was still in development. I would imagine it's almost guaranteed to be successful as long as the costs aren't bloated.
Condemned antisemitism in the wake of a the Boulder, Colorado attack and expressed gratitude to all law enforcement, including ICE (explicitly).
Im guessing many of them were indifferent about the verbiage singling ICE or they didn't want to be against the condemnation and gratitude in spite of it.
All of the legacy media has a bias toward the right. ALL of them. The only time I've heard them be objective is when they all asserted, repeatedly, that The Big Lie was in fact a falsehood. And that was because THEY were accused of negligence.
Outside of that, they're always showing the left at their worst and allowing the right to pitch their radicalism. They need the left to be sensationalist and the right has to be sane washed because reality is so extreme that people assume the news is sensationalizing them.
Genuine question, is it antisemitic for ADL to suggest that opposing genocide is antisemitic? It kinda feels like ADL, IDF, and other political figures want to treat warmongering as an inherently Jewish trait or a Jewish right or something.
It honestly feels like they're painting Jews with this image. Kind of like how Republicans have painted a picture of America that is antithetical to American values as laid out in the constitution. But they will still claim that you hate America if you oppose them in any way.
I would rather vote for someone who got spite funding by a nazi than to vote for an anti-America, nazi/terrorist. And that's anyone supporting the current regime.
The Democratic Party is just a collection of people. If people like him and Manchin join and vote for liberal policies that would otherwise go conservative, it's a net positive. Anything that they would normally vote against, any other Republican would also vote against.
The important bit is to push blue area representatives to represent further left ideals. That's what has fucked us over in the past.
Agreed. To me, VII was always the ugly one in the series. Unfortunately I played VIII first and was blown away at the technical marvel the game is.
Afterwards I played VII as a kid and it was unplayable. It felt like playing with cheap, homemade, wooden dolls. It was always the game that needed a remake the most.
She's using "partisan" as a buzzword. It's either an appeal to voters who have soured on the Democrat name or it's a validation fascism as equally valid.
I'm hoping it's the former. But considering she was never really great at the press secretary thing, I'm wondering if she'll be the token ex-Dem for right-wingers.
Angela Bassett was phenomenal. There was a lot of good in the movie. It's a shame they seemed to try to differentiate themselves so hard from Aquaman because the dark wasn't very cinematic.
Overall I thought it was a very mediocre post-Endgame movie with fun moments like The Marvels and Captain America: BNW. There are much worse and much better movies post-Endgame.
It was definitely on the lower end as far as Marvel movies go. I'd say it was just a hair better than bad. There were some good scenes, but overall they didn't flow from one to the other. The main villain wasn't interesting. There were some neat concepts that ended up feeling like missed opportunities (a feeling I've had A LOT post-Endgame).
I'd put it neck-and-neck with Wakanda Forever. Better than Thor L&T, Ant-Man QuANTuMANia, Captain America BNW, and Black Widow. Nowhere near as good as Shang-Chi, Spider-Man FFH, Spider-Man NWH, Doctor Strange MoM, GOTG Vol. 3, or Thunderbolts. I thought Eternals was fun too. Not as good as those mentioned, but still better than The Marvels.
"We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union [...] promote the general Welfare [...] do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Promoting the general welfare is literally stated in the constitution as one of the purposes of the United States. Anyone disagreeing with that hates America.
So far, citizens have been deported. But not sent to the torture prison. Having said that, the way that they have sent people away means they absolutely could send a citizen and there's no extra protection.
In other words, without due process we should assume every single one of them are innocent citizens (not that an immigrant deserves to be tortured any more than a citizen).
I haven't heard anyone question if it was still in development. I would imagine it's almost guaranteed to be successful as long as the costs aren't bloated.