Skip Navigation

Posts
50
Comments
1,011
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • And now I'm proud of you for not referencing The Avengers

  • You probably would, you simulated schooner

  • Hey, thanks! :-)

    I'm proud of you for being kind to others

  • When you have nothing going on for long enough, you find little things to do to stay sane.

    I also made this game but haven't worked on it in a while:

    https://old-man-bombin.itch.io/ragegame

    And made a Minecraft add-on that lets you tame bats that can see ores through walls and attack enemies.

  • Got some certifications

    Also, from a different trainer

  • I swear I've been called this by a wild-west cowboy

  • They break down faster than your shoe string and spread microplastics. Just my guess.

  • Oh thank God. I'm probably going to update my Pixel soon and was worried

  • No problem, lol :-)

  • He's from Chicago, and it would be cool to have a Pope that speaks like a classic Chicago mobster.

    "Myeah see, I thought I told yous guise what not to be actin' that way see, myeah."

  • Is anyone else disappointed that the new Pope didn't sound like these guys?

  • If it's a good deed performed with blood money...

    In that question, you've proven my point.

    The deed is good even if the funds are not. The ends do not justify the means, but the means do not nullify the ends.

  • I know what you're saying - no deed performed by a billionaire can be seen as good, because it was performed by a billionaire. But you're wrong.

  • No, you're just wrong.

    You said that a billionaire can't do anything good.

    The other guy said that billionaires can perform good actions but can't truly be considered good people.

    I made no remarks about billionaires at all - only tried to clarify your misunderstanding.

    They were disagreeing with you, and you are making yourself look like an idiot.

    You finally edited the "bever" out of your original comment, though, so good for you.

  • I mean, they're right. It does sound really stupid